Protected areas are not enough to protect blue carbon ecosystems and their services

Carbon credits generally cannot be awarded for organic carbon stored in salt marshes (called “blue carbon”) that are already protected. To be approved projects must provide activities that are in addition to this protection, more than what is occurring through “business-as-usual”. This requirement is referred to as “additionality”. “Protection” usually is considered to constitute prevention of direct disturbance to a marsh. However, threats to marshes often occur outside the borders of the protected area and amelioration of such threats should be eligible for blue carbon crediting. This paper reviews the threats of coastal squeeze, excessive nitrogen loading, deprivation of allochthonous sediments, and waterfowl grazing. Although the impacts can result in loss of marsh area and erosion of their carbon-rich soil, these threats are the result of activities in the watershed outside the bounds of the protected area. Some examples of actions within watersheds that reduce or remove these threats are provided and should be fundable through carbon credits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1714372
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protected areas are not enough to protect blue carbon ecosystems and their services

Gail L. Chmura
Frontiers in Marine Science
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Protected areas are not enough to protect blue carbon ecosystems and their services

Gail L. Chmura
article en

Abstract

Carbon credits generally cannot be awarded for organic carbon stored in salt marshes (called “blue carbon”) that are already protected. To be approved projects must provide activities that are in addition to this protection, more than what is occurring through “business-as-usual”. This requirement is referred to as “additionality”. “Protection” usually is considered to constitute prevention of direct disturbance to a marsh. However, threats to marshes often occur outside the borders of the protected area and amelioration of such threats should be eligible for blue carbon crediting. This paper reviews the threats of coastal squeeze, excessive nitrogen loading, deprivation of allochthonous sediments, and waterfowl grazing. Although the impacts can result in loss of marsh area and erosion of their carbon-rich soil, these threats are the result of activities in the watershed outside the bounds of the protected area. Some examples of actions within watersheds that reduce or remove these threats are provided and should be fundable through carbon credits.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
McGill University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.