Long-term variability of glycemic markers and risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background & aims This research aimed to assess how long-term fluctuations in glycemic indicators (FPG and HbA1c), measured by the coefficient of variation (CV), influence the risk of all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods A review of all literature related to the variability of glycemic indicators published up to June 2025 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A total of 3,663 articles were found and evaluated based on the title, introduction, and full text, leading to the selection of 15 studies for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results Fifteen studies ( n = 584,237) were included. Higher glycemic variability was generally linked to increased mortality risk, but this connection showed extreme statistical heterogeneity (I² >85% for both HbA1c-CV and FPG-CV). Therefore, single pooled estimates (e.g., HR: 0.39 for HbA1c-CV) were unreliable and required stratified interpretation; initial inverse associations were corrected after harmonizing effect coding (Table S1). Importantly, meta-regression revealed that cohort mean age was the strongest moderator, explaining nearly 48.3% (R² = 48.3%) of the between-study heterogeneity. The prognostic link was notably stronger in younger populations, suggesting a diminished effect in older adults due to competing risks. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of the overall effect direction. Conclusions Long-term glycemic variability is linked to all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes. Given the extreme heterogeneity, our findings emphasize that age strongly modifies the risk estimates, suggesting that GV is a more potent prognostic marker in younger T2DM populations. Clinically, potential monitoring of GV should be highly individualized and considered hypothesis-generating, particularly in high-risk, younger subgroups. Standardization of metrics and further prospective studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-025-00577-9
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term variability of glycemic markers and risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Niloofar Deravi, Yaser Khakpour, Mohadeseh Poudineh, Parisa Alsadat Dadkhah et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Long-term variability of glycemic markers and risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Niloofar Deravi, Yaser Khakpour, Mohadeseh Poudineh, Parisa Alsadat Dadkhah, SeyedAbbas Pakmehr, Fatemeh Chichagi, Reza Khademi, Reza Hossein Zadeh, Hamed Taheri, Seyyed-Ghavam Shafagh, Mahdi Nakhaee, Amirhesam Amirbeik, Mahdyieh Naziri, Saher Hashem, Spartaco Sani, Arshia Shafiei, Mahsa Aslani Khiavi, Roja Valipoor, Kiarash Sadat Rafiei, Anahita Kalanimehr
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background & aims This research aimed to assess how long-term fluctuations in glycemic indicators (FPG and HbA1c), measured by the coefficient of variation (CV), influence the risk of all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods A review of all literature related to the variability of glycemic indicators published up to June 2025 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A total of 3,663 articles were found and evaluated based on the title, introduction, and full text, leading to the selection of 15 studies for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results Fifteen studies ( n = 584,237) were included. Higher glycemic variability was generally linked to increased mortality risk, but this connection showed extreme statistical heterogeneity (I² >85% for both HbA1c-CV and FPG-CV). Therefore, single pooled estimates (e.g., HR: 0.39 for HbA1c-CV) were unreliable and required stratified interpretation; initial inverse associations were corrected after harmonizing effect coding (Table S1). Importantly, meta-regression revealed that cohort mean age was the strongest moderator, explaining nearly 48.3% (R² = 48.3%) of the between-study heterogeneity. The prognostic link was notably stronger in younger populations, suggesting a diminished effect in older adults due to competing risks. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of the overall effect direction. Conclusions Long-term glycemic variability is linked to all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes. Given the extreme heterogeneity, our findings emphasize that age strongly modifies the risk estimates, suggesting that GV is a more potent prognostic marker in younger T2DM populations. Clinically, potential monitoring of GV should be highly individualized and considered hypothesis-generating, particularly in high-risk, younger subgroups. Standardization of metrics and further prospective studies are warranted.

The Egyptian Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 37(1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Kazan Federal University (RU), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Guilan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.