A SHORT NOTE ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PENROSE-HALTING THEOREM
Abstract In The Emperor’s New Mind [7], Roger Penrose proves a variant of the halting problem, and uses it to argue that humans have cognitive capacities beyond the computable. In this short note, I explicate his argument, and show how it fails, via a corollary of his result. My response to Penrose is in fact of a kind with a number of prior responses: he assumes human powers, that (as the corollary shows) no computer could have. However, as far as I am aware, no one has previously addressed this specific form of the argument, in the direct way that I will.
Authors
- Nick Huggett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5699-5479)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2025.10135
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00