Effectiveness and safety of traditional East Asian herbal medicine for major depressive disorder with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Traditional East Asian herbal medicine (TEAHM) has been used for centuries to treat depression and anxiety. However, conventional psychopharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety have limitations. This systematic review aimed to provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TEAHM in patients with MDD and anxiety.Methods: Eleven electronic databases were searched until July 22, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TEAHM to treat MDD and anxiety. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. TEAHM’s effectiveness and safety were evaluated in a meta-analysis.Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1,730 participants were included. TEAHM alone significantly improved the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores compared to those with the use of antidepressants alone ((MD = -1.52, 95% CI: -1.96 to -1.08, P < 0.00001, I² = 95%). Their combination significantly improved the HAMA scores (MD = -1.29, 95% CI: -1.49 to -1.09, P < 0.00001, I² = 97%). Compared with antidepressants alone, TEAHM alone or in combination significantly improved Hamilton Depression Scale scores. The risk with TEAHM alone and combination therapy was similar to that with antidepressants alone. No severe adverse events were observed. Overall, the risk of bias was high. The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate.Conclusions: TEAHM or combination therapy may be beneficial for treating patients with MDD and anxiety. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to low methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies. Higher-level clinical trials are required in the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.25050
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and safety of traditional East Asian herbal medicine for major depressive disorder with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Celine Jang, Seokyung Park, Sang-Ho Kim
Journal of Korean Medicine
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Effectiveness and safety of traditional East Asian herbal medicine for major depressive disorder with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Celine Jang, Seokyung Park, Sang-Ho Kim
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Traditional East Asian herbal medicine (TEAHM) has been used for centuries to treat depression and anxiety. However, conventional psychopharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety have limitations. This systematic review aimed to provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TEAHM in patients with MDD and anxiety.Methods: Eleven electronic databases were searched until July 22, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TEAHM to treat MDD and anxiety. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. TEAHM’s effectiveness and safety were evaluated in a meta-analysis.Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1,730 participants were included. TEAHM alone significantly improved the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores compared to those with the use of antidepressants alone ((MD = -1.52, 95% CI: -1.96 to -1.08, P < 0.00001, I² = 95%). Their combination significantly improved the HAMA scores (MD = -1.29, 95% CI: -1.49 to -1.09, P < 0.00001, I² = 97%). Compared with antidepressants alone, TEAHM alone or in combination significantly improved Hamilton Depression Scale scores. The risk with TEAHM alone and combination therapy was similar to that with antidepressants alone. No severe adverse events were observed. Overall, the risk of bias was high. The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate.Conclusions: TEAHM or combination therapy may be beneficial for treating patients with MDD and anxiety. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to low methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies. Higher-level clinical trials are required in the future.

Journal of Korean MedicineVol. 46(4)
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.