Cluster Policy, Innovation, and Firm Productivity. An Econometric Assessment of the Flemish Spearhead Cluster Program

ABSTRACT The Flemish government launched its Spearhead Cluster (SHC) policy in 2017. The aim is to boost strategic sectors by setting up cluster initiatives which coordinate collaborative R&D initiatives. In this paper, we analyze whether becoming a member of such a cluster initiative has an impact on the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of the firm. We exploit firm‐level data between 2013 and 2020 to estimate TFP and apply various difference‐in‐differences approaches to assess the programs' treatment effects. We find that becoming a member of a cluster has an average positive impact on firm‐level TFP of around 4% roughly, robust to different econometric specifications. A mechanism analysis suggests that the benefit of the cluster policy is driven by knowledge spillovers among the cluster members because we find that the positive treatment effect is negatively moderated by the distance among cluster members.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Science
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70037
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cluster Policy, Innovation, and Firm Productivity. An Econometric Assessment of the Flemish Spearhead Cluster Program

Dirk Czarnitzki, Astrid Volckaert, Pierluigi Angelino
Journal of Regional Science
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Cluster Policy, Innovation, and Firm Productivity. An Econometric Assessment of the Flemish Spearhead Cluster Program

Dirk Czarnitzki, Astrid Volckaert, Pierluigi Angelino
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Flemish government launched its Spearhead Cluster (SHC) policy in 2017. The aim is to boost strategic sectors by setting up cluster initiatives which coordinate collaborative R&D initiatives. In this paper, we analyze whether becoming a member of such a cluster initiative has an impact on the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of the firm. We exploit firm‐level data between 2013 and 2020 to estimate TFP and apply various difference‐in‐differences approaches to assess the programs' treatment effects. We find that becoming a member of a cluster has an average positive impact on firm‐level TFP of around 4% roughly, robust to different econometric specifications. A mechanism analysis suggests that the benefit of the cluster policy is driven by knowledge spillovers among the cluster members because we find that the positive treatment effect is negatively moderated by the distance among cluster members.

Journal of Regional ScienceVol. 66(2)
Centre for European Economic Research (DE), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE), Conseil Européen de l'Industrie des Peintures des Encres d'Imprimerie et des Couleurs d'Art (BE), Katholieke Hogeschool Vives (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.