Comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in gastric versus rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a two-center retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to evaluate and compare tumor response, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors in gastric versus rectal GIST patients treated with neoadjuvant IM. We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with locally advanced gastric (n = 83) and rectal (n = 51) GISTs who received neoadjuvant IM followed by surgery between 2012 and 2024. Radiologic and pathologic responses were assessed, and survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. Preoperative IM (Pre-IM) duration was stratified by the median of 9 months (IQR: 6–12 months). Before IM therapy, the mean tumor size was significantly larger in the gastric group than in the rectal group (12.07 ± 5.42 cm vs. 6.42 ± 2.96 cm, P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant tumor shrinkage after IM (post-treatment size: 8.35 ± 4.33 cm vs. 4.25 ± 2.11 cm, P < 0.001), with comparable percentage reduction in size (29.7%±19.3% vs. 32.5%±17.7%, P = 0.402). Radiologic and pathologic response rates were also similar between the groups. However, rectal GISTs exhibited significantly better overall survival (5-year OS: 98.0% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.003) and a trend toward improved relapse-free survival (5-year RFS: 87.2% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.057). These survival benefits persisted across subgroups stratified by tumor size and Pre-IM duration, with a significant OS advantage observed in rectal GIST patients treated for ≥ 9 months (P = 0.025). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed rectal tumor location as an independent predictor of improved RFS (HR = 0.242, P = 0.022) and OS (HR = 0.044, P = 0.003). Gastric and rectal GISTs showed similar antitumor responses to neoadjuvant IM, while survival appeared more favorable for rectal tumors, particularly with extended Pre-IM. However, this result may be influenced by confounding factors and requires further validation in larger prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04467-w
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in gastric versus rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a two-center retrospective cohort study

Shichai Hong, X. Su, Jinhu Chen, Tao Lin et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in gastric versus rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a two-center retrospective cohort study

Shichai Hong, X. Su, Jinhu Chen, Tao Lin, Yongjian Zhou, Zhiming Cai, Yibin Lin, Yang Zhang, Lin Lü, Zhimao Ye
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare tumor response, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors in gastric versus rectal GIST patients treated with neoadjuvant IM. We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with locally advanced gastric (n = 83) and rectal (n = 51) GISTs who received neoadjuvant IM followed by surgery between 2012 and 2024. Radiologic and pathologic responses were assessed, and survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. Preoperative IM (Pre-IM) duration was stratified by the median of 9 months (IQR: 6–12 months). Before IM therapy, the mean tumor size was significantly larger in the gastric group than in the rectal group (12.07 ± 5.42 cm vs. 6.42 ± 2.96 cm, P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant tumor shrinkage after IM (post-treatment size: 8.35 ± 4.33 cm vs. 4.25 ± 2.11 cm, P < 0.001), with comparable percentage reduction in size (29.7%±19.3% vs. 32.5%±17.7%, P = 0.402). Radiologic and pathologic response rates were also similar between the groups. However, rectal GISTs exhibited significantly better overall survival (5-year OS: 98.0% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.003) and a trend toward improved relapse-free survival (5-year RFS: 87.2% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.057). These survival benefits persisted across subgroups stratified by tumor size and Pre-IM duration, with a significant OS advantage observed in rectal GIST patients treated for ≥ 9 months (P = 0.025). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed rectal tumor location as an independent predictor of improved RFS (HR = 0.242, P = 0.022) and OS (HR = 0.044, P = 0.003). Gastric and rectal GISTs showed similar antitumor responses to neoadjuvant IM, while survival appeared more favorable for rectal tumors, particularly with extended Pre-IM. However, this result may be influenced by confounding factors and requires further validation in larger prospective studies.

BMC GastroenterologyVol. 26(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.