More-than-Human Mediation: Social Scientists in the Making of Environmental AI Systems

What can social scientists contribute to the development of AI? To date, their efforts have primarily been viewed through the lens of AI's social consequences, such as offering legal and ethical guidelines and providing observation-based critiques. However, there is a growing demand for broader engagement of social scientists in AI research itself. Based on the experience of organizing and participating in two environmental AI projects, this paper aims to illuminate the unique challenges and opportunities for social scientists working with , rather than just for , engineers. Building on literature from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and anthropology on research collaboration, it shows that social scientists can take the role as mediators of AI development in three key ways: (1) connecting human and nonhuman actors across multiple disciplines and sources; (2) negotiating challenges posed by disciplinary differences and human-nonhuman distinctions; and (3) modulating the power dynamics between engineers and things in data production and interpretation. By doing so, this paper argues, social scientists can uncover the “more-than-human” dimension of AI development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology & Human Values
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439251393756
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More-than-Human Mediation: Social Scientists in the Making of Environmental AI Systems

Myung‐Ae Choi, Buhm Soon Park
Science Technology & Human Values
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

More-than-Human Mediation: Social Scientists in the Making of Environmental AI Systems

Myung‐Ae Choi, Buhm Soon Park
article en

Abstract

What can social scientists contribute to the development of AI? To date, their efforts have primarily been viewed through the lens of AI's social consequences, such as offering legal and ethical guidelines and providing observation-based critiques. However, there is a growing demand for broader engagement of social scientists in AI research itself. Based on the experience of organizing and participating in two environmental AI projects, this paper aims to illuminate the unique challenges and opportunities for social scientists working with , rather than just for , engineers. Building on literature from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and anthropology on research collaboration, it shows that social scientists can take the role as mediators of AI development in three key ways: (1) connecting human and nonhuman actors across multiple disciplines and sources; (2) negotiating challenges posed by disciplinary differences and human-nonhuman distinctions; and (3) modulating the power dynamics between engineers and things in data production and interpretation. By doing so, this paper argues, social scientists can uncover the “more-than-human” dimension of AI development.

Science Technology & Human Values
Science and Technology Policy Institute (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Graduate School USA (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.