Scenario‐Focused Decision Analysis: Discussion and Research Questions

ABSTRACT Scenarios have been used in risk management for many years, first in scenario planning to identify risks and their possible impacts, which may then be explored using quantitative risk analysis. Qualitative scenario planning has been used in supporting decision‐making and strategic deliberations generally, and as a tool in problem formulation for quantitative multi‐criteria decision analysis (MCDA) studies. Until relatively recently, however, scenario thinking has not been more fully combined with quantitative MCDA studies. There are issues to overcome in forming meaningful quantitative comparisons between scenarios and in presenting the results to decision‐makers in ways that help them reach a conclusion which they judge to be requisite. This paper discusses these issues and offers a research agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.70025
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scenario‐Focused Decision Analysis: Discussion and Research Questions

Simon French
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Scenario‐Focused Decision Analysis: Discussion and Research Questions

Simon French
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scenarios have been used in risk management for many years, first in scenario planning to identify risks and their possible impacts, which may then be explored using quantitative risk analysis. Qualitative scenario planning has been used in supporting decision‐making and strategic deliberations generally, and as a tool in problem formulation for quantitative multi‐criteria decision analysis (MCDA) studies. Until relatively recently, however, scenario thinking has not been more fully combined with quantitative MCDA studies. There are issues to overcome in forming meaningful quantitative comparisons between scenarios and in presenting the results to decision‐makers in ways that help them reach a conclusion which they judge to be requisite. This paper discusses these issues and offers a research agenda.

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisVol. 32(3)
University of Manchester (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.