Crash typology of professional cycling crashes

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequent but underreported consequence of professional cycling crashes, yet current helmet testing standards primarily simulate head-first impacts, and their representation of real-world head impact scenarios is unclear. This study explores crash typology of professional cycling crashes involving head-ground contact through systematic video analysis of 128 head impacts occurring between 2012 and 2024. Most head impacts occurred during road races (113/128, 88 %) and were associated with multi-cyclist collisions rather than single-cyclist crashes, with topple-over crashes representing the most common mechanism (49 %), followed by skid-outs. Riders predominantly landed front or front-side relative to their direction of travel, with 66 % of impacts occurring in a sideways body posture, and head contact most frequently involved the helmet's side and rim regions (>50 % of impacts). Notably, body-first head impacts dominated the crash profiles (92 %), with the torso or arms contacting the ground before the head, while direct head-first impacts comprised 8 % of cases. Impact severity was distributed relatively evenly across low (30 %), medium (33 %), and high (36 %) categories, with collision-related crashes being more likely to result in high-severity outcomes than non-contact crashes. These findings reveal a potential mismatch between current helmet testing protocols and the predominant mechanisms observed in professional cycling crashes. Video-based analysis provides critical insights into impact mechanisms that are overlooked by traditional injury reporting methods, particularly highlighting the prevalence of body-first impacts and side-rim head impacts. This crash typology may provide a foundation for future biomechanical studies and could support the development of helmet testing methods that better represent real-world cycling impact scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108332
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crash typology of professional cycling crashes

Paul Sherratt, Séan Mitchell, Kevin Gildea, Jon Farmer et al.
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Crash typology of professional cycling crashes

Paul Sherratt, Séan Mitchell, Kevin Gildea, Jon Farmer, Rory England, Benjamin P Krbavac
article en

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequent but underreported consequence of professional cycling crashes, yet current helmet testing standards primarily simulate head-first impacts, and their representation of real-world head impact scenarios is unclear. This study explores crash typology of professional cycling crashes involving head-ground contact through systematic video analysis of 128 head impacts occurring between 2012 and 2024. Most head impacts occurred during road races (113/128, 88 %) and were associated with multi-cyclist collisions rather than single-cyclist crashes, with topple-over crashes representing the most common mechanism (49 %), followed by skid-outs. Riders predominantly landed front or front-side relative to their direction of travel, with 66 % of impacts occurring in a sideways body posture, and head contact most frequently involved the helmet's side and rim regions (>50 % of impacts). Notably, body-first head impacts dominated the crash profiles (92 %), with the torso or arms contacting the ground before the head, while direct head-first impacts comprised 8 % of cases. Impact severity was distributed relatively evenly across low (30 %), medium (33 %), and high (36 %) categories, with collision-related crashes being more likely to result in high-severity outcomes than non-contact crashes. These findings reveal a potential mismatch between current helmet testing protocols and the predominant mechanisms observed in professional cycling crashes. Video-based analysis provides critical insights into impact mechanisms that are overlooked by traditional injury reporting methods, particularly highlighting the prevalence of body-first impacts and side-rim head impacts. This crash typology may provide a foundation for future biomechanical studies and could support the development of helmet testing methods that better represent real-world cycling impact scenarios.

Accident Analysis & PreventionVol. 225
Loughborough University (GB), Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.