Cost-performance trade-off analysis of physicochemical phosphorus removal systems for wastewater treatment: A bi-objective optimization approach
In an increasingly competitive world, industries face growing pressure to improve efficiency while meeting strict environmental and social standards. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a key role in reducing the environmental impact of water use across industrial, agricultural, and domestic activities. This study presents a bi-objective optimization framework to support chemical dosing decisions in physicochemical phosphorus removal (PPR) systems. Using an edible-oil WWTP as a case study, two common metal salts (aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride) are compared, considering operational cost and phosphorus removal efficiency as conflicting objectives. Polynomial surrogate models enabled the integration of BioWin PPR models into the optimization problem, and the weighted sum and $ \varepsilon $-constraint methods were used to estimate the Pareto fronts, yielding complementary solutions. The proposed framework provides a practical decision-support tool for WWTPs by revealing cost-performance trade-offs. Results show that costs escalate disproportionately: reducing effluent P from 3.0 to 1.0 mg-P/L increased costs by 114% with aluminum sulfate and 355% with ferric chloride. The framework is adaptable to different PPR systems and influent conditions.
Authors
- Claudia Santiviago (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-0453)
- Diego Gabriel Rossit (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-445X)
- Sergio Nesmachnow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-4012)
- Jimena Ferreira
- Florencia Caro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1620-4939)
Institutions
- Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
- Universidad Nacional del Sur (AR)
- Universidad de Montevideo (UY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2026006
- Primary Topic
- Phosphorus and nutrient management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00