Mechanistic insights into ligand selectivity in μ- and δ-opioid receptors beyond the “message–address” conceptual framework

Ligand selectivity between μ -opioid receptors ( μ -OR) and δ -opioid receptors ( δ -OR) is key for improving opioid analgesics. While the “message–address” hypothesis has been central to explaining this selectivity, we present evidence for an additional mechanism. Chimeric receptor and mutagenesis studies identify residue 2.63 in the orthosteric pocket as a key determinant of morphine's μ / δ -OR selectivity, while EM-1's selectivity involves a combination of residues at positions 2.63 and 3.29, the N-terminus, and extracellular loop 3 (ECL3). Approaches like voltage-clamp fluorometry, engineered zinc-bridge and microscale thermophoresis show that EM-1's Y 1 P 2 W 3 F 4 sequence confers over 1500-fold μ / δ -OR selectivity, driven by steric hindrance and a β -turn structure. β -Endorphin, with a more flexible sequence, binds non-selectively to both receptors. Morphine's rigid isoquinoline scaffold and broader geometry restrict it to binding through the wide ECL2-transmembrane (TM) 5 cleft, explaining its modest μ / δ -OR selectivity. These findings reveal that μ / δ -OR selectivity is driven by both “message–address” interactions and receptor–specific binding pathways, advancing opioid drug design. μ / δ -OR selectivity is dictated by a combination of canonical “message–address” interactions and receptor-specific binding pathways, advancing our understanding of endogenous peptide sequence evolution and informing the rational design of selective opioid therapeutics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.11.039
Primary Topic
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic insights into ligand selectivity in μ- and δ-opioid receptors beyond the “message–address” conceptual framework

Xiangqian Kong, R. Chen, Xin Zhang, Jin Wang et al.
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
article

Mechanistic insights into ligand selectivity in μ- and δ-opioid receptors beyond the “message–address” conceptual framework

Xiangqian Kong, R. Chen, Xin Zhang, Jin Wang, Xinghua Li, Ye Yu, Hongyan Song
article en

Abstract

Ligand selectivity between μ -opioid receptors ( μ -OR) and δ -opioid receptors ( δ -OR) is key for improving opioid analgesics. While the “message–address” hypothesis has been central to explaining this selectivity, we present evidence for an additional mechanism. Chimeric receptor and mutagenesis studies identify residue 2.63 in the orthosteric pocket as a key determinant of morphine's μ / δ -OR selectivity, while EM-1's selectivity involves a combination of residues at positions 2.63 and 3.29, the N-terminus, and extracellular loop 3 (ECL3). Approaches like voltage-clamp fluorometry, engineered zinc-bridge and microscale thermophoresis show that EM-1's Y 1 P 2 W 3 F 4 sequence confers over 1500-fold μ / δ -OR selectivity, driven by steric hindrance and a β -turn structure. β -Endorphin, with a more flexible sequence, binds non-selectively to both receptors. Morphine's rigid isoquinoline scaffold and broader geometry restrict it to binding through the wide ECL2-transmembrane (TM) 5 cleft, explaining its modest μ / δ -OR selectivity. These findings reveal that μ / δ -OR selectivity is driven by both “message–address” interactions and receptor–specific binding pathways, advancing opioid drug design. μ / δ -OR selectivity is dictated by a combination of canonical “message–address” interactions and receptor-specific binding pathways, advancing our understanding of endogenous peptide sequence evolution and informing the rational design of selective opioid therapeutics.

Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica BVol. 16(3)
China Pharmaceutical University (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.