Active Comparison: A Strategy for Building Competence and Confidence in Experiential Learning

Higher education has long prioritised knowledge acquisition over skill development, often neglecting the competencies essential for workplace readiness (Andrews & Higson, 2008; Clarke, 2018; Finch, Peacock, Levallet, & Foster, 2016; Succi & Canovi, 2020). As globalisation and economic pressures reshape educational priorities, there is increasing pressure from employers (Boughey & McKenna, 2021; Goriot, 2024; Tuononen et al., 2022) and accreditation bodies (Abbasi, Ali, & Bibi, 2018; Mainga, Murphy-Braynen, Moxey, & Quddus, 2022) to integrate experiential learning to enhance employability (Amoroso & Burke, 2018; Mainga et al., 2022; Succi & Canovi, 2020). However, traditional assessment practices often encourage students to focus on grades rather than developing transferable skills such as problem-solving, communication, and collaboration (Fischer, Bearman, Boud, & Tai, 2023; Souto-Otero, Donnelly, & Kanol, 2023; Velasco, 2012). The need to create an environment that facilitates the practical application of accumulated knowledge and bridges the gap between theory and practice has emerged (Fantinelli, Cortini, Di Fiore, Iervese, & Galanti, 2024) as a crucial topic of discussion within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) (Mtawa, Fongwa, & Wilson-Strydom, 2019). This article explores active comparison as a pedagogical strategy for bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application. Drawing on Nicol’s (2020) DO-COMPARE-EXPLICIT framework, we examine how structured feedback mechanisms shift students’ focus from assessment performance to competency development. Active comparison promotes self-regulated learning, encourages engagement with external comparators, and preserves student agency while maintaining educational rigour (Souto-Otero et al., 2023). Using a case study from a business school setting, we demonstrate how embedding active comparison within experiential courses enhances students’ confidence, competence, and employability. Findings indicate that students who engage with active comparison develop stronger evaluative judgement, leading to deeper learning and improved workplace readiness. The study also highlights the role of external partners in fostering authentic learning experiences, supporting the development of practical skills alongside disciplinary knowledge (McArthur, Kubacki, Pang, & Alcaraz, 2017; Sokhanvar, Salehi, & Sokhanvar, 2021). By advancing active comparison as a scalable and effective pedagogical tool, this article contributes to the discourse on employability-focused education. It provides a model for integrating experiential learning with structured feedback to better prepare graduates for professional success in an evolving labour market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56433/azmg1v45
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Active Comparison: A Strategy for Building Competence and Confidence in Experiential Learning

Alison Gibb, Nick Quinn
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice
Higher Education and Employability
article

Active Comparison: A Strategy for Building Competence and Confidence in Experiential Learning

Alison Gibb, Nick Quinn
article en

Abstract

Higher education has long prioritised knowledge acquisition over skill development, often neglecting the competencies essential for workplace readiness (Andrews & Higson, 2008; Clarke, 2018; Finch, Peacock, Levallet, & Foster, 2016; Succi & Canovi, 2020). As globalisation and economic pressures reshape educational priorities, there is increasing pressure from employers (Boughey & McKenna, 2021; Goriot, 2024; Tuononen et al., 2022) and accreditation bodies (Abbasi, Ali, & Bibi, 2018; Mainga, Murphy-Braynen, Moxey, & Quddus, 2022) to integrate experiential learning to enhance employability (Amoroso & Burke, 2018; Mainga et al., 2022; Succi & Canovi, 2020). However, traditional assessment practices often encourage students to focus on grades rather than developing transferable skills such as problem-solving, communication, and collaboration (Fischer, Bearman, Boud, & Tai, 2023; Souto-Otero, Donnelly, & Kanol, 2023; Velasco, 2012). The need to create an environment that facilitates the practical application of accumulated knowledge and bridges the gap between theory and practice has emerged (Fantinelli, Cortini, Di Fiore, Iervese, & Galanti, 2024) as a crucial topic of discussion within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) (Mtawa, Fongwa, & Wilson-Strydom, 2019). This article explores active comparison as a pedagogical strategy for bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application. Drawing on Nicol’s (2020) DO-COMPARE-EXPLICIT framework, we examine how structured feedback mechanisms shift students’ focus from assessment performance to competency development. Active comparison promotes self-regulated learning, encourages engagement with external comparators, and preserves student agency while maintaining educational rigour (Souto-Otero et al., 2023). Using a case study from a business school setting, we demonstrate how embedding active comparison within experiential courses enhances students’ confidence, competence, and employability. Findings indicate that students who engage with active comparison develop stronger evaluative judgement, leading to deeper learning and improved workplace readiness. The study also highlights the role of external partners in fostering authentic learning experiences, supporting the development of practical skills alongside disciplinary knowledge (McArthur, Kubacki, Pang, & Alcaraz, 2017; Sokhanvar, Salehi, & Sokhanvar, 2021). By advancing active comparison as a scalable and effective pedagogical tool, this article contributes to the discourse on employability-focused education. It provides a model for integrating experiential learning with structured feedback to better prepare graduates for professional success in an evolving labour market.

Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic PracticeVol. 13(4)
Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.