Navigating Relationship Tensions: Role of Paradoxical Mindsets and Response Repertoires in Managing Employee–Organization Relationships During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Situated within an interpretive approach, this study examined senior corporate executives’ discursive construction of tensions encountered while managing employee-organization-relationships (EORs) over remote work during the Covid-19 pandemic and the strategies employed to manage these tensions. In-depth interviews with 17 communication and employee relations executives from the Fortune , Forbes , and LinkedIn best employer lists for 2021 and 2022 revealed four key tensions: organizational identity (people and planet versus profit), dialogic (one voice versus many voices), diversity (exclusion versus inclusion), and boundary (work versus home). Our interviews also revealed corporate internal crisis communication (ICC) strategies to navigate these tensions, such as empathetic leadership communication and purpose communication. Participants foregrounded transcendent ( more-than ) strategies alongside selection ( either-or ) and balance ( both-and ) strategies. Implications for theory and practice across employee relationship management, ICC, and tensions in a post pandemic world where change, uncertainty, and remote work persists are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251405855
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Relationship Tensions: Role of Paradoxical Mindsets and Response Repertoires in Managing Employee–Organization Relationships During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Hilke Steenkamp, Ganga S. Dhanesh
Management Communication Quarterly
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Navigating Relationship Tensions: Role of Paradoxical Mindsets and Response Repertoires in Managing Employee–Organization Relationships During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Hilke Steenkamp, Ganga S. Dhanesh
article en

Abstract

Situated within an interpretive approach, this study examined senior corporate executives’ discursive construction of tensions encountered while managing employee-organization-relationships (EORs) over remote work during the Covid-19 pandemic and the strategies employed to manage these tensions. In-depth interviews with 17 communication and employee relations executives from the Fortune , Forbes , and LinkedIn best employer lists for 2021 and 2022 revealed four key tensions: organizational identity (people and planet versus profit), dialogic (one voice versus many voices), diversity (exclusion versus inclusion), and boundary (work versus home). Our interviews also revealed corporate internal crisis communication (ICC) strategies to navigate these tensions, such as empathetic leadership communication and purpose communication. Participants foregrounded transcendent ( more-than ) strategies alongside selection ( either-or ) and balance ( both-and ) strategies. Implications for theory and practice across employee relationship management, ICC, and tensions in a post pandemic world where change, uncertainty, and remote work persists are discussed.

Management Communication Quarterly
University of Maryland, College Park (US), Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.