The Reality Gap in Robotics: Challenges, Solutions, and Best Practices

Machine learning has facilitated significant advancements across various robotics domains, including navigation, locomotion, and manipulation. Many such achievements have been driven by the extensive use of simulation as a critical tool for training and testing robotic systems prior to their deployment in real-world environments. However, simulations consist of abstractions and approximations that inevitably introduce discrepancies between simulated and real environments, known as the reality gap. These discrepancies significantly hinder the successful transfer of systems from simulation to the real world. Closing this gap remains one of the most pressing challenges in robotics. Recent advances in sim-to-real transfer have demonstrated promising results across various platforms, including locomotion, navigation, and manipulation. By leveraging techniques such as domain randomization, real-to-sim transfer, state and action abstractions, and sim–real cotraining, many works have overcome the reality gap. However, challenges persist, and a deeper understanding of the reality gap's root causes and solutions is necessary. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of the sim-to-real landscape, highlighting the causes, solutions, and evaluation metrics for the reality gap and sim-to-real transfer. Our goal is to provide a guide to identifying the challenges and opportunities for future advancements in sim-to-real transfer for robotic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-031924-100130
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reality Gap in Robotics: Challenges, Solutions, and Best Practices

Tucker Hermans, Caelan Reed Garrett, Jiaxu Xing, Yashraj Narang et al.
1 citations
Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
article

The Reality Gap in Robotics: Challenges, Solutions, and Best Practices

Tucker Hermans, Caelan Reed Garrett, Jiaxu Xing, Yashraj Narang, Angel Romero, Iretiayo Akinola, Davide Scaramuzza, Fábio Ramos, Elie Aljalbout, Eric Heiden, Abhishek Gupta, Dieter Fox
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Machine learning has facilitated significant advancements across various robotics domains, including navigation, locomotion, and manipulation. Many such achievements have been driven by the extensive use of simulation as a critical tool for training and testing robotic systems prior to their deployment in real-world environments. However, simulations consist of abstractions and approximations that inevitably introduce discrepancies between simulated and real environments, known as the reality gap. These discrepancies significantly hinder the successful transfer of systems from simulation to the real world. Closing this gap remains one of the most pressing challenges in robotics. Recent advances in sim-to-real transfer have demonstrated promising results across various platforms, including locomotion, navigation, and manipulation. By leveraging techniques such as domain randomization, real-to-sim transfer, state and action abstractions, and sim–real cotraining, many works have overcome the reality gap. However, challenges persist, and a deeper understanding of the reality gap's root causes and solutions is necessary. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of the sim-to-real landscape, highlighting the causes, solutions, and evaluation metrics for the reality gap and sim-to-real transfer. Our goal is to provide a guide to identifying the challenges and opportunities for future advancements in sim-to-real transfer for robotic systems.

Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Washington (US), University of Zurich (CH), University of Utah (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Nvidia (United States) (US), Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.