The Lexical Typology of Sensory Perception

Sensory language has fascinated researchers, as it is here that meaning most clearly straddles biology and culture. Since the seminal work on color vocabularies, typologists have attempted to describe and explain worldwide linguistic patterns in this area. One proposal that has captured the attention of many is the idea that there is a hierarchy of the senses that can account for phenomena as diverse as lexicalization patterns, frequency of use, diachronic stability, order of acquisition, and more. We argue, to the contrary, that a universal sensory hierarchy is no longer tenable. Emerging crosslinguistic data do not support a single hierarchy of the senses that is applicable across distinct linguistic and psycholinguistic properties. This does not mean we must abandon sensory language typology altogether. Alternative methods for identifying crosslinguistic regularities—such as semantic maps—show considerable promise. Moreover, while the preoccupation with a sensory hierarchy has led to an overly narrow research focus, moving beyond it opens up new avenues of research in this area. Future research has potential to uncover new patterns of sensory language structure and use across diverse languages, account for their distribution over cultures, and deepen our understanding of how language interfaces with cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Linguistics
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011425-091857
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lexical Typology of Sensory Perception

Asifa Majid, Elisabeth Norcliffe
1 citations
Annual Review of Linguistics
Categorization, perception, and language
2.12
article

The Lexical Typology of Sensory Perception

Asifa Majid, Elisabeth Norcliffe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sensory language has fascinated researchers, as it is here that meaning most clearly straddles biology and culture. Since the seminal work on color vocabularies, typologists have attempted to describe and explain worldwide linguistic patterns in this area. One proposal that has captured the attention of many is the idea that there is a hierarchy of the senses that can account for phenomena as diverse as lexicalization patterns, frequency of use, diachronic stability, order of acquisition, and more. We argue, to the contrary, that a universal sensory hierarchy is no longer tenable. Emerging crosslinguistic data do not support a single hierarchy of the senses that is applicable across distinct linguistic and psycholinguistic properties. This does not mean we must abandon sensory language typology altogether. Alternative methods for identifying crosslinguistic regularities—such as semantic maps—show considerable promise. Moreover, while the preoccupation with a sensory hierarchy has led to an overly narrow research focus, moving beyond it opens up new avenues of research in this area. Future research has potential to uncover new patterns of sensory language structure and use across diverse languages, account for their distribution over cultures, and deepen our understanding of how language interfaces with cognition.

Annual Review of LinguisticsVol. 12(1)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Categorization, perception, and language
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.