Toward dignity-centred ethics in the treatment of longstanding and severe eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review

Longstanding and severe eating disorders (LSEDs) are frequently marked by medical risk, therapeutic impasse, and exclusion from standard care pathways. Yet insufficient attention has been paid to the ethical dimensions of treatment for those with complex and longstanding illness trajectories, in particular from the perspective of those with lived experience. This paper aims to address this gap as a lived-experience-authored narrative review focused on the concept of dignity as a guiding value of ethical care in LSEDs. Informed by critical interpretive synthesis, narrative ethics, and reflective practice methods, the authors integrate multiple sources of evidence. They adopt a lens of epistemic injustice, situating subjective knowledge alongside empirical research findings and the wider conceptual and ethical considerations of treatment provision. The findings identify recurring patterns of undignified care in the treatment of LSEDs, including the normalisation of neglect, coercive practices, and exclusionary models of treatment. Principles and practical steps are outlined to inform dignity-affirming care, which include prioritising relational safety, co-produced decision-making, and re-medicalisation of LSEDs in ways that do not sacrifice autonomy. Ultimately, the authors determine that a dignity-centred approach to LSEDs requires a fundamental shift in how we understand risk, chronicity, and the place of lived experience in clinical ethics. This paper offers a conceptual and methodological framework to support that shift, calling for collective responsibility and structurally embedded forms of care that respect the knowledge, rights, and needs of those most affected by LSEDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/mhealthwellb7942
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward dignity-centred ethics in the treatment of longstanding and severe eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review

Marissa Adams, James Leonard Downs
2 citations
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
4.61
article

Toward dignity-centred ethics in the treatment of longstanding and severe eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review

Marissa Adams, James Leonard Downs
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Longstanding and severe eating disorders (LSEDs) are frequently marked by medical risk, therapeutic impasse, and exclusion from standard care pathways. Yet insufficient attention has been paid to the ethical dimensions of treatment for those with complex and longstanding illness trajectories, in particular from the perspective of those with lived experience. This paper aims to address this gap as a lived-experience-authored narrative review focused on the concept of dignity as a guiding value of ethical care in LSEDs. Informed by critical interpretive synthesis, narrative ethics, and reflective practice methods, the authors integrate multiple sources of evidence. They adopt a lens of epistemic injustice, situating subjective knowledge alongside empirical research findings and the wider conceptual and ethical considerations of treatment provision. The findings identify recurring patterns of undignified care in the treatment of LSEDs, including the normalisation of neglect, coercive practices, and exclusionary models of treatment. Principles and practical steps are outlined to inform dignity-affirming care, which include prioritising relational safety, co-produced decision-making, and re-medicalisation of LSEDs in ways that do not sacrifice autonomy. Ultimately, the authors determine that a dignity-centred approach to LSEDs requires a fundamental shift in how we understand risk, chronicity, and the place of lived experience in clinical ethics. This paper offers a conceptual and methodological framework to support that shift, calling for collective responsibility and structurally embedded forms of care that respect the knowledge, rights, and needs of those most affected by LSEDs.

Academia Mental Health and Well-BeingVol. 2(4)
Nashville Oncology Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.