Advancing tumor-on-a-chip technologies: a 3D-printed, PDMS-free biochip for breast cancer studies

Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) systems are microfluidic technologies that replicate human physiology and disease conditions<i>ex vivo</i>, offering a promising alternative to animal models in preclinical drug testing and fundamental biological studies. Traditionally, OoCs systems are fabricated using conventional soft-lithography techniques with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) primarily due to its excellent inherent properties, including gas permeability, optical transparency, and biocompatibility. However, PDMS presents several notable shortcomings, most its limited scalability, which have prompted the search for more rapid and scalable fabrication processes. In this study, we present a cost-effective, efficient, and rapid design, development, and prototyping process for a microfluidic tumor-on-a-chip (TOC) platform technology for applications in cancer research and drug screening. Specifically, we present a novel 3D-printed, closed-system TOC device (i.e. Biochip) featuring distinct yet interconnected tumor and stromal regions, separated by an array of trapezoidal microposts, and fabricated with high precision and fidelity. The proposed Biochip was fabricated utilizing vat polymerization with a biocompatible resin and was compared alongside a conventional PDMS-glass (PDMS-G) and PDMS-laminate (PDMS-L) TOCs to evaluate its biological outcomes. The fabricated Biochip supported closed-channel 3D cell culture for testing up to 5 d. Using two triple-negative breast cancer cells, namely SUM-159 and MDA-MB-231, we further assessed and cross compared cellular migration, viability, and morphology across the Biochip, PDMS-G, and PDMS-L platforms. Overall, this work establishes a 3D-printed Biochip as a robust, cost-effective, and time-saving alternative to PDMS-based OoC, and specifically TOC systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofabrication
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ae2719
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing tumor-on-a-chip technologies: a 3D-printed, PDMS-free biochip for breast cancer studies

Twinkle Jina Minette Manoharan, Mehdi Nikkhah, Shaun Wootten, Kalpana Ravi et al.
1 citations
Biofabrication
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
article

Advancing tumor-on-a-chip technologies: a 3D-printed, PDMS-free biochip for breast cancer studies

Twinkle Jina Minette Manoharan, Mehdi Nikkhah, Shaun Wootten, Kalpana Ravi, Ronin-Mae Komarnisky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) systems are microfluidic technologies that replicate human physiology and disease conditions<i>ex vivo</i>, offering a promising alternative to animal models in preclinical drug testing and fundamental biological studies. Traditionally, OoCs systems are fabricated using conventional soft-lithography techniques with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) primarily due to its excellent inherent properties, including gas permeability, optical transparency, and biocompatibility. However, PDMS presents several notable shortcomings, most its limited scalability, which have prompted the search for more rapid and scalable fabrication processes. In this study, we present a cost-effective, efficient, and rapid design, development, and prototyping process for a microfluidic tumor-on-a-chip (TOC) platform technology for applications in cancer research and drug screening. Specifically, we present a novel 3D-printed, closed-system TOC device (i.e. Biochip) featuring distinct yet interconnected tumor and stromal regions, separated by an array of trapezoidal microposts, and fabricated with high precision and fidelity. The proposed Biochip was fabricated utilizing vat polymerization with a biocompatible resin and was compared alongside a conventional PDMS-glass (PDMS-G) and PDMS-laminate (PDMS-L) TOCs to evaluate its biological outcomes. The fabricated Biochip supported closed-channel 3D cell culture for testing up to 5 d. Using two triple-negative breast cancer cells, namely SUM-159 and MDA-MB-231, we further assessed and cross compared cellular migration, viability, and morphology across the Biochip, PDMS-G, and PDMS-L platforms. Overall, this work establishes a 3D-printed Biochip as a robust, cost-effective, and time-saving alternative to PDMS-based OoC, and specifically TOC systems.

BiofabricationVol. 18(1)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.