Developing a fraud prevention framework for universities: a systematic literature review

Higher education institutions face major challenges related to fraudulent practices that can threaten institutional integrity. This systematic review attempts to identify fraud prevention components, classify various types of fraud, and examine oversight strategies to reduce incidents of fraud at universities. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted on the Scopus and Web of Science databases. This review covers articles published between 2000 and 2023, resulting in 174 identified articles, with 18 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The review protocol has been registered on OSF. Reliability test using NVivo software to assess the risk of bias and article quality, with data extraction and synthesis performed by two reviewers from the research team to ensure accuracy and objectivity. The review results revealed aspects of fraud prevention, including integrity frameworks, risk assessment, training and development, internal audits, and whistleblowing systems. The types of fraud identified include corruption, asset misappropriation, financial statement fraud, misuse of campus property, bribery, and procurement fraud. Effective oversight strategies include the use of technology, internal controls, regular audits and monitoring, education and training, and clear policies and procedures. The findings propose a fraud prevention pyramid model as a framework that integrates various levels of interrelated and mutually supportive strategies. Despite limitations related to the risk of bias in the studies reviewed, the results of this review provide an important foundation for the development of more effective fraud prevention systems and recommend further research to validate the practical implementation of this pyramid model in diverse higher education institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2593736
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a fraud prevention framework for universities: a systematic literature review

Gugus Irianto, Nur Ravita Hanun, Raden Arief Setyawan, Mirna Amirya et al.
Cogent Business & Management
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Developing a fraud prevention framework for universities: a systematic literature review

Gugus Irianto, Nur Ravita Hanun, Raden Arief Setyawan, Mirna Amirya, Shamsul Nahar Abdullah, Purwanto Purwanto, Sri Wahyuni
article en

Abstract

Higher education institutions face major challenges related to fraudulent practices that can threaten institutional integrity. This systematic review attempts to identify fraud prevention components, classify various types of fraud, and examine oversight strategies to reduce incidents of fraud at universities. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted on the Scopus and Web of Science databases. This review covers articles published between 2000 and 2023, resulting in 174 identified articles, with 18 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The review protocol has been registered on OSF. Reliability test using NVivo software to assess the risk of bias and article quality, with data extraction and synthesis performed by two reviewers from the research team to ensure accuracy and objectivity. The review results revealed aspects of fraud prevention, including integrity frameworks, risk assessment, training and development, internal audits, and whistleblowing systems. The types of fraud identified include corruption, asset misappropriation, financial statement fraud, misuse of campus property, bribery, and procurement fraud. Effective oversight strategies include the use of technology, internal controls, regular audits and monitoring, education and training, and clear policies and procedures. The findings propose a fraud prevention pyramid model as a framework that integrates various levels of interrelated and mutually supportive strategies. Despite limitations related to the risk of bias in the studies reviewed, the results of this review provide an important foundation for the development of more effective fraud prevention systems and recommend further research to validate the practical implementation of this pyramid model in diverse higher education institutions.

Cogent Business & ManagementVol. 12(1)
INTI International University (MY), University of Brawijaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.