An <i>in vitro</i> investigation of 5-aminolevulinic acid and acridine orange as sensitizers in radiodynamic therapy for prostate and breast cancer

<i>Purpose.</i>Radiodynamic Therapy (RDT) is an emerging technique that enhances the therapeutic effects of radiation by using photosensitizers to amplify tumor cell damage while minimizing harm to normal tissues. This<i>in vitro</i>investigation compares the biocompatibility and sensitizing efficacy of two candidate photosensitizers, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and acridine orange (AO), in human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF7) and prostate adenocarcinoma (PC3) cell lines.<i>Materials and Methods.</i>MCF7 and PC3 cell lines were cultured and exposed to a range of 5-ALA and AO concentrations to assess biocompatibility using PrestoBlue viability assays. Based on these results, optimal concentrations were selected for irradiation experiments. Cells were then seeded in T-25 flasks and incubated with 5-ALA or AO prior to receiving 2 Gy or 4 Gy of megavoltage photon radiation (18 MV or 45 MV). Clonogenic assays were performed to determine the surviving fractions of the cells.<i>Results</i>. 5-ALA exhibited a broader biocompatibility profile than AO, remaining non-cytotoxic up to 100 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>. In contrast, AO showed cytotoxic effects above 1 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>. At 18 MV, limited radiosensitization was observed, except at higher 5-ALA concentrations. However, at 45 MV, both sensitizers significantly reduced cell survival, particularly at 4 Gy. The most pronounced effect was observed with 100 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>5-ALA, which consistently resulted in lower surviving fractions than AO across both cell lines. Each sensitizer demonstrated differing effectiveness depending on the cell line and photon energy used.<i>Conclusions</i>. Both 5-ALA and AO enhanced the cytotoxic effects of radiation, but 5-ALA demonstrated superior biocompatibility and more consistent radiosensitization across both cell lines. Notably, the effectiveness of both sensitizers increased with higher photon energy, reinforcing the importance of beam energy in RDT design. These results underscore the advantages of 5-ALA over AO and highlight the need to optimize both sensitizer selection and radiation energy in clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae2688
Primary Topic
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An in vitro investigation of 5-aminolevulinic acid and acridine orange as sensitizers in radiodynamic therapy for prostate and breast cancer

Dae‐Myoung Yang, C.‐M. Charlie, Dusica Cvetković, Lili Chen et al.
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
article

An in vitro investigation of 5-aminolevulinic acid and acridine orange as sensitizers in radiodynamic therapy for prostate and breast cancer

Dae‐Myoung Yang, C.‐M. Charlie, Dusica Cvetković, Lili Chen, Tristan K Gaddis
article en

Abstract

<i>Purpose.</i>Radiodynamic Therapy (RDT) is an emerging technique that enhances the therapeutic effects of radiation by using photosensitizers to amplify tumor cell damage while minimizing harm to normal tissues. This<i>in vitro</i>investigation compares the biocompatibility and sensitizing efficacy of two candidate photosensitizers, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and acridine orange (AO), in human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF7) and prostate adenocarcinoma (PC3) cell lines.<i>Materials and Methods.</i>MCF7 and PC3 cell lines were cultured and exposed to a range of 5-ALA and AO concentrations to assess biocompatibility using PrestoBlue viability assays. Based on these results, optimal concentrations were selected for irradiation experiments. Cells were then seeded in T-25 flasks and incubated with 5-ALA or AO prior to receiving 2 Gy or 4 Gy of megavoltage photon radiation (18 MV or 45 MV). Clonogenic assays were performed to determine the surviving fractions of the cells.<i>Results</i>. 5-ALA exhibited a broader biocompatibility profile than AO, remaining non-cytotoxic up to 100 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>. In contrast, AO showed cytotoxic effects above 1 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>. At 18 MV, limited radiosensitization was observed, except at higher 5-ALA concentrations. However, at 45 MV, both sensitizers significantly reduced cell survival, particularly at 4 Gy. The most pronounced effect was observed with 100 μg ml<sup>-1</sup>5-ALA, which consistently resulted in lower surviving fractions than AO across both cell lines. Each sensitizer demonstrated differing effectiveness depending on the cell line and photon energy used.<i>Conclusions</i>. Both 5-ALA and AO enhanced the cytotoxic effects of radiation, but 5-ALA demonstrated superior biocompatibility and more consistent radiosensitization across both cell lines. Notably, the effectiveness of both sensitizers increased with higher photon energy, reinforcing the importance of beam energy in RDT design. These results underscore the advantages of 5-ALA over AO and highlight the need to optimize both sensitizer selection and radiation energy in clinical applications.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 12(1)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.