Cybersecurity Risks and Vulnerabilities in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

ObjectiveThis study identifies cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risks in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and proposes a cybersecurity framework and an assessment tool for RAS systems.BackgroundRAS systems are increasingly integrated into networks which raise cybersecurity concerns. These systems can enhance surgical outcomes but are potential cyberattack targets, which can affect clinician care, patient safety, and organizational operations.MethodSurveys and interviews were conducted with stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, cybersecurity professionals, and hospital administrators) to collect perspectives on RAS cybersecurity. Thematic analysis was used to develop an RAS cybersecurity framework. Then, stakeholders contributed to creating an RAS cybersecurity assessment tool using Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).ResultsSurvey responses (<i>n</i> = 84) revealed that 48.8% of respondents were familiar with RAS cybersecurity. Only 24.6% of clinical respondents were aware of their organization's cybersecurity policy. Interviews (<i>n</i> = 15) identified vulnerabilities such as inadequate training, limited communication between manufacturers and healthcare systems, and gaps in regulations. Failure modes focused on consequences of cyberattacks on RAS systems, with severity assessments related to patient health and technology reliability/integrity completed and outcome actions identified.ConclusionUnderstanding RAS cybersecurity challenges is still in its infancy. Key vulnerabilities include insufficient training, limited data sharing, and external threats. The framework illustrates the interconnectedness of stakeholders, while the FMECA assessment tool addresses current vulnerabilities in RAS systems.ApplicationRAS cybersecurity vulnerability and risks should be carefully considered when integrating systems into healthcare organizations, and the RAS cybersecurity assessment tool can be used by stakeholders to systematically identify and analyze potential cybersecurity failure modes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251401735
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity Risks and Vulnerabilities in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Nicholas Perkins, Patrick E. Fuller, Alfredo M. Carbonell, Jackie Cha et al.
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Cybersecurity Risks and Vulnerabilities in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Nicholas Perkins, Patrick E. Fuller, Alfredo M. Carbonell, Jackie Cha, Holden Duffie, Dan Li
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study identifies cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risks in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and proposes a cybersecurity framework and an assessment tool for RAS systems.BackgroundRAS systems are increasingly integrated into networks which raise cybersecurity concerns. These systems can enhance surgical outcomes but are potential cyberattack targets, which can affect clinician care, patient safety, and organizational operations.MethodSurveys and interviews were conducted with stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, cybersecurity professionals, and hospital administrators) to collect perspectives on RAS cybersecurity. Thematic analysis was used to develop an RAS cybersecurity framework. Then, stakeholders contributed to creating an RAS cybersecurity assessment tool using Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).ResultsSurvey responses (<i>n</i> = 84) revealed that 48.8% of respondents were familiar with RAS cybersecurity. Only 24.6% of clinical respondents were aware of their organization's cybersecurity policy. Interviews (<i>n</i> = 15) identified vulnerabilities such as inadequate training, limited communication between manufacturers and healthcare systems, and gaps in regulations. Failure modes focused on consequences of cyberattacks on RAS systems, with severity assessments related to patient health and technology reliability/integrity completed and outcome actions identified.ConclusionUnderstanding RAS cybersecurity challenges is still in its infancy. Key vulnerabilities include insufficient training, limited data sharing, and external threats. The framework illustrates the interconnectedness of stakeholders, while the FMECA assessment tool addresses current vulnerabilities in RAS systems.ApplicationRAS cybersecurity vulnerability and risks should be carefully considered when integrating systems into healthcare organizations, and the RAS cybersecurity assessment tool can be used by stakeholders to systematically identify and analyze potential cybersecurity failure modes.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyVol. 68(4)
Prisma Health (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Washington (US), Greenville Memorial Hospital (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.