Validating contact angle algorithms for droplets in parallel-plate

Parallel-plate channels, defined as two closely spaced plates confining fluid motion, are widely used in microfluidics. Optical contact angle measurement techniques are particularly suited for analyzing capillary phenomena in such configurations. While prior studies have utilized these methods to evaluate contact angle in electrowetting-on-dielectric systems with stationary droplets, a comprehensive validation of the measurement accuracy remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, in order to verify the accuracy of the observation results, the theoretical value of the contact angle between the two parallel hydrophobic surfaces is calculated by using the two-parameter ellipsoid segment model, and the actual measured value obtained by the mainstream technology is compared. Experimental results demonstrate exceptional agreement between theory and observation: distilled water exhibits a negligible percentage error of 0.548%, while phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer shows a deviation of merely 1.102%. This systematic comparison of theoretical and empirical data for both water and PBS conclusively validates the precision of contemporary parallel-plate contact angle measurement methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0282561
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating contact angle algorithms for droplets in parallel-plate

Qihua Huang, Chudong Xu, Ming‐Chien Yang, Rongkun Zheng et al.
1 citations
AIP Advances
Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
0.73
article

Validating contact angle algorithms for droplets in parallel-plate

Qihua Huang, Chudong Xu, Ming‐Chien Yang, Rongkun Zheng, Jianing Xue, Fang Lin, Yiping Xu, Meng Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Parallel-plate channels, defined as two closely spaced plates confining fluid motion, are widely used in microfluidics. Optical contact angle measurement techniques are particularly suited for analyzing capillary phenomena in such configurations. While prior studies have utilized these methods to evaluate contact angle in electrowetting-on-dielectric systems with stationary droplets, a comprehensive validation of the measurement accuracy remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, in order to verify the accuracy of the observation results, the theoretical value of the contact angle between the two parallel hydrophobic surfaces is calculated by using the two-parameter ellipsoid segment model, and the actual measured value obtained by the mainstream technology is compared. Experimental results demonstrate exceptional agreement between theory and observation: distilled water exhibits a negligible percentage error of 0.548%, while phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer shows a deviation of merely 1.102%. This systematic comparison of theoretical and empirical data for both water and PBS conclusively validates the precision of contemporary parallel-plate contact angle measurement methodologies.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(12)
South China Agricultural University (CN), Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validating contact angle algorithms for droplets in parallel-plate — Qihua Huang, Chudong Xu, et al. · AIP Advances (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS