A systematic review of AI in second language acquisition using the expanded SAMR model (2015–2024)

This systematic review assesses the extent to which AI applications enhance versus transform SLA tasks. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Web of Science and Scopus (2015–2024), screened and included 281 studies after full-text assessment. The included studies were coded designs with the expanded SAMR model (product-process criteria), then analyzed overall distributions, skill-specific patterns, and emergent design blueprints. Results show that Augmentation studies dominated the field, with 35% of the reviewed studies achieving Modification or Redefinition status. Generative AI (GenAI), emerging after 2022, enabled but did not guarantee the adoption of higher-level designs. Writing and speaking comprised 60% of the corpus and mostly remained at enhancement; reading and listening together accounted for 12%, with about half of reading and one-third of listening studies reaching Modification through personalized or multimodal redesign. Vocabulary demonstrated the highest transformation ratio. Based on transformation-level cases, this review synthesizes a GenAI-driven three-stage framework (pre-class diagnostics/adaptation; in-class dialogic co-construction; post-class data-driven extension) and offer practical guidance for educators and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Computing
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09833-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of AI in second language acquisition using the expanded SAMR model (2015–2024)

L Zhang, Farrah Dina Yusop, Wenting Bao, Tianshu Wang et al.
1 citations
Discover Computing
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
article

A systematic review of AI in second language acquisition using the expanded SAMR model (2015–2024)

L Zhang, Farrah Dina Yusop, Wenting Bao, Tianshu Wang, Xin Ruan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This systematic review assesses the extent to which AI applications enhance versus transform SLA tasks. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Web of Science and Scopus (2015–2024), screened and included 281 studies after full-text assessment. The included studies were coded designs with the expanded SAMR model (product-process criteria), then analyzed overall distributions, skill-specific patterns, and emergent design blueprints. Results show that Augmentation studies dominated the field, with 35% of the reviewed studies achieving Modification or Redefinition status. Generative AI (GenAI), emerging after 2022, enabled but did not guarantee the adoption of higher-level designs. Writing and speaking comprised 60% of the corpus and mostly remained at enhancement; reading and listening together accounted for 12%, with about half of reading and one-third of listening studies reaching Modification through personalized or multimodal redesign. Vocabulary demonstrated the highest transformation ratio. Based on transformation-level cases, this review synthesizes a GenAI-driven three-stage framework (pre-class diagnostics/adaptation; in-class dialogic co-construction; post-class data-driven extension) and offer practical guidance for educators and policymakers.

Discover ComputingVol. 28(1)
North Carolina State University (US), Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), University of Malaya (MY), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Anhui Provincial Department of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.