AI assistance improves reader agreement in digital mammography: A multireader crossover study of general and breast subspecialty radiologists

This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on inter- and intra-rater agreement in mammography interpretation, comparing improvements in reliability between general and breast subspecialty radiologists in a clinical setting. This study was conducted using anonymized digital mammograms from 65 women aged 40-74 years undergoing routine screening. Fourteen radiologists, grouped by experience, assessed images in a multi-reader, multi-case, crossover design with and without AI assistance. Statistical analyses, including Cohen's Kappa and meta-analysis, measured inter- and intra-rater reliability across radiological variables. AI assistance significantly improved agreement with the gold standard for both general and breast subspecialty radiologists. Variables such as BI-RADS breast density and lesion location showed marked improvements, particularly among general radiologists, where Kappa values for BI-RADS breast density rose from 50.01% to 81.38% with AI. Subspecialists demonstrated smaller performance gains, likely due to higher baseline accuracy. AI also enhanced intra-rater reliability and reduced variability across experience levels. These findings support AI's role as a valuable adjunct in breast cancer screening, addressing the shortage of experienced radiologists. Further research in real-world settings is necessary to confirm these results and optimize AI integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31065-3
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI assistance improves reader agreement in digital mammography: A multireader crossover study of general and breast subspecialty radiologists

Mohammad Hakimi, Mohadese Ahmadzade, Parham Rabiee, Khadijeh Bakhtavar et al.
Scientific Reports
AI in cancer detection
article

AI assistance improves reader agreement in digital mammography: A multireader crossover study of general and breast subspecialty radiologists

Mohammad Hakimi, Mohadese Ahmadzade, Parham Rabiee, Khadijeh Bakhtavar, Nasrin Ahmadinejad, Shahram Akhlaghpoor, Hamidreza Rouientan, Masoomeh Norouzi, Fatemeh Abbası, Sepideh Haghi, Ensi Khalili Pouya, Nastaran Abdi, Hasan Madadi, Fatemeh Bahmanyar, Hamid Laalinia, Maryam Bahrambeigi, Fatima Moosavian
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on inter- and intra-rater agreement in mammography interpretation, comparing improvements in reliability between general and breast subspecialty radiologists in a clinical setting. This study was conducted using anonymized digital mammograms from 65 women aged 40-74 years undergoing routine screening. Fourteen radiologists, grouped by experience, assessed images in a multi-reader, multi-case, crossover design with and without AI assistance. Statistical analyses, including Cohen's Kappa and meta-analysis, measured inter- and intra-rater reliability across radiological variables. AI assistance significantly improved agreement with the gold standard for both general and breast subspecialty radiologists. Variables such as BI-RADS breast density and lesion location showed marked improvements, particularly among general radiologists, where Kappa values for BI-RADS breast density rose from 50.01% to 81.38% with AI. Subspecialists demonstrated smaller performance gains, likely due to higher baseline accuracy. AI also enhanced intra-rater reliability and reduced variability across experience levels. These findings support AI's role as a valuable adjunct in breast cancer screening, addressing the shortage of experienced radiologists. Further research in real-world settings is necessary to confirm these results and optimize AI integration.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Motamed Cancer Institute (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.