Cadaveric evidence on lymph node counts and grossing accuracy in pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer staging

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains the most accurate method for staging prostate cancer, yet the adequacy of nodal yield and the absence of standardized specimen processing remain unresolved. This cadaveric study aimed to establish histologically verified benchmarks for lymph node number, size, and detectability. Super-extended PLND was performed in 13 male soft-embalmed cadavers prepared with arterial silicone injection. Specimens were grossed under stereomicroscopy, and all tissue was submitted for histology. A total of 641 lymph nodes were identified, with a median of 46 nodes per cadaver (range 17-92). All extended dissections exceeded the commonly proposed minimum threshold of 10 nodes. The median lymph node size was 4.1 mm, but only 58.1% were detected grossly, while 41.9% were identified exclusively by histology. Detection was strongly size-dependent, with logistic regression showing a 1.12-fold increase in odds for each additional millimeter in node size. These findings demonstrate substantial anatomical variability and highlight the limitations of gross-only protocols, which underestimate nodal yield and risk missing small nodes. Our results support extended PLND as a more reliable staging approach than limited dissection and emphasize the value of total histological submission to ensure accurate pathological staging in prostate cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29196-8
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cadaveric evidence on lymph node counts and grossing accuracy in pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer staging

Parkpoom Piyaman, Adisorn Ratanayotha, Varat Woranisarakul, Katunyou Mahamongkol et al.
Scientific Reports
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Cadaveric evidence on lymph node counts and grossing accuracy in pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer staging

Parkpoom Piyaman, Adisorn Ratanayotha, Varat Woranisarakul, Katunyou Mahamongkol, Nattaporn Wanvimolkul, Kittitad Sovikul, Pal Tunksakul
article en

Abstract

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains the most accurate method for staging prostate cancer, yet the adequacy of nodal yield and the absence of standardized specimen processing remain unresolved. This cadaveric study aimed to establish histologically verified benchmarks for lymph node number, size, and detectability. Super-extended PLND was performed in 13 male soft-embalmed cadavers prepared with arterial silicone injection. Specimens were grossed under stereomicroscopy, and all tissue was submitted for histology. A total of 641 lymph nodes were identified, with a median of 46 nodes per cadaver (range 17-92). All extended dissections exceeded the commonly proposed minimum threshold of 10 nodes. The median lymph node size was 4.1 mm, but only 58.1% were detected grossly, while 41.9% were identified exclusively by histology. Detection was strongly size-dependent, with logistic regression showing a 1.12-fold increase in odds for each additional millimeter in node size. These findings demonstrate substantial anatomical variability and highlight the limitations of gross-only protocols, which underestimate nodal yield and risk missing small nodes. Our results support extended PLND as a more reliable staging approach than limited dissection and emphasize the value of total histological submission to ensure accurate pathological staging in prostate cancer.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Siriraj Hospital (TH), Mahidol University (TH), The University of Osaka (JP)
Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.