Punching Down: People Justify More Police Force Against Lower-Than Higher-SES Male Civilians

Understanding socioeconomic status (SES)-based stereotyping and discrimination is imperative but is seldom focal to intergroup relations research in social psychology. In the present work, we examine how people differentially justify police force across civilians’ SES. Across three experiments, we found that perceivers justify more police force to regulate the behavior of lower-SES than higher-SES men. These SES-based biases remain even when holding civilians’ race constant. We also found that stereotypes of lower-SES men as both less sensitive to pain and more physically threatening relate to the belief that they are deserving of more police force than higher-SES men. The final study suggests that physical threat stereotypes may account for the SES-based biases better than pain sensitivity stereotypes. This research contributes to important social psychological theories by increasing understanding of class-based stereotypes and their outcomes and has practical implications for considering how lay impressions of police-civilian interactions could have real consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Cognition
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2025.43.6.535
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Punching Down: People Justify More Police Force Against Lower-Than Higher-SES Male Civilians

Erin Freiburger, Kurt Hugenberg, Mattea Sim, Christine M. Jones
Social Cognition
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Punching Down: People Justify More Police Force Against Lower-Than Higher-SES Male Civilians

Erin Freiburger, Kurt Hugenberg, Mattea Sim, Christine M. Jones
article en

Abstract

Understanding socioeconomic status (SES)-based stereotyping and discrimination is imperative but is seldom focal to intergroup relations research in social psychology. In the present work, we examine how people differentially justify police force across civilians’ SES. Across three experiments, we found that perceivers justify more police force to regulate the behavior of lower-SES than higher-SES men. These SES-based biases remain even when holding civilians’ race constant. We also found that stereotypes of lower-SES men as both less sensitive to pain and more physically threatening relate to the belief that they are deserving of more police force than higher-SES men. The final study suggests that physical threat stereotypes may account for the SES-based biases better than pain sensitivity stereotypes. This research contributes to important social psychological theories by increasing understanding of class-based stereotypes and their outcomes and has practical implications for considering how lay impressions of police-civilian interactions could have real consequences.

Social CognitionVol. 43(6)
Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Punching Down: People Justify More Police Force Against Lower-Than Higher-SES Male Civilians — Erin Freiburger, Kurt Hugenberg, et al. · Social Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS