Prediction of Speech-Correcting Surgery in Patients With a Cleft Palate After Primary Palatoplasty: A Logistic Regression Model

ObjectiveTo identify predictors of speech-correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L) and to develop pre- and postoperative prediction models.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingWilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Patients, ParticipantsA total of 239 patients with CP ± L who underwent primary palatoplasty between 2008 and 2017 and completed standardized speech assessment at age 5.InterventionsStraight-line palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty (Sommerlad) within the first year of life.Main Outcome Measure(s)Likelihood of speech-correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty. Potential predictors included cleft type, cleft width, age at palatoplasty, associated syndromes, and postoperative complications such as palatal dehiscence and oronasal fistula. Logistic regression models were developed using pre- and postoperative variables. Model performance was assessed by AUROC, calibration, Brier score, and <i>R</i>².ResultsOf 239 patients, 49% required speech-correcting surgery. In the preoperative model, cleft width and presence of syndromes were significant predictors, showing moderate discrimination (AUROC: 0.694; 95% CI: 0.620-0.759) and good calibration. Adding oronasal fistula in the postoperative model minimally improved performance (AUROC: 0.697; 95% CI: 0.621-0.764).ConclusionsA clinically applicable model was developed to predict the likelihood of speech-correcting surgery following primary palatoplasty. Wide clefts, the presence of syndromes, and oronasal fistula were identified as key predictors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251401507
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Speech-Correcting Surgery in Patients With a Cleft Palate After Primary Palatoplasty: A Logistic Regression Model

Emma C. Paes, Lieke Hofman, Harm Winters, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen et al.
1 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
article

Prediction of Speech-Correcting Surgery in Patients With a Cleft Palate After Primary Palatoplasty: A Logistic Regression Model

Emma C. Paes, Lieke Hofman, Harm Winters, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, Kevin Jenniskens
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify predictors of speech-correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L) and to develop pre- and postoperative prediction models.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingWilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Patients, ParticipantsA total of 239 patients with CP ± L who underwent primary palatoplasty between 2008 and 2017 and completed standardized speech assessment at age 5.InterventionsStraight-line palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty (Sommerlad) within the first year of life.Main Outcome Measure(s)Likelihood of speech-correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty. Potential predictors included cleft type, cleft width, age at palatoplasty, associated syndromes, and postoperative complications such as palatal dehiscence and oronasal fistula. Logistic regression models were developed using pre- and postoperative variables. Model performance was assessed by AUROC, calibration, Brier score, and <i>R</i>².ResultsOf 239 patients, 49% required speech-correcting surgery. In the preoperative model, cleft width and presence of syndromes were significant predictors, showing moderate discrimination (AUROC: 0.694; 95% CI: 0.620-0.759) and good calibration. Adding oronasal fistula in the postoperative model minimally improved performance (AUROC: 0.697; 95% CI: 0.621-0.764).ConclusionsA clinically applicable model was developed to predict the likelihood of speech-correcting surgery following primary palatoplasty. Wide clefts, the presence of syndromes, and oronasal fistula were identified as key predictors.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.