PANGAEA: Assessing Geospatial Foundation Models Capabilities through a Global and Inclusive Benchmark

Geospatial foundation models (GFMs) have emerged as powerful tools for extracting representations from Earth observation (EO) data, but their evaluation remains inconsistent and narrow. Existing works often evaluate on suboptimal downstream datasets and tasks that are often too easy or too narrow, limiting the usefulness of the evaluations to assess the real-world applicability of GFMs. Additionally, there is a distinct lack of diversity in current evaluation protocols, which fail to account for the multiplicity of image resolutions, sensor types, and temporalities, which further complicates the assessment of GFM performance. In particular, most existing benchmarks are geographically biased toward North America and Europe, questioning the global applicability of GFMs. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PANGAEA, a standardized evaluation protocol that covers a diverse set of datasets, tasks, resolutions, sensor modalities, and temporalities. It establishes a robust and widely applicable benchmark for GFMs. We evaluate the most popular GFMs openly available on this benchmark and analyze their performance across several domains. In particular, we compare these models to supervised baselines [e.g., UNet and vanilla vision-Transformer (ViT)] and assess their effectiveness when faced with limited labeled data. Our findings highlight the limitations of GFMs under different scenarios, showing that they do not consistently outperform supervised models. PANGAEA is designed to be highly extensible, allowing for the seamless inclusion of new datasets, models, and tasks in future research. By releasing the evaluation code and benchmark, we aim to enable other researchers to replicate our experiments and build upon our work, fostering a more principled evaluation protocol for large pretrained geospatial models. The code is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/VMarsocci/pangaea-bench" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/VMarsocci/pangaea-bench</ext-link>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2025.3628194
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PANGAEA: Assessing Geospatial Foundation Models Capabilities through a Global and Inclusive Benchmark

Maarten Vergauwen, Heng Fang, Yifang Ban, Ritu Yadav et al.
2 citations
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
2.27
article

PANGAEA: Assessing Geospatial Foundation Models Capabilities through a Global and Inclusive Benchmark

Maarten Vergauwen, Heng Fang, Yifang Ban, Ritu Yadav, Sebastian Gerard, Andrea Nascetti, Sebastian Häfner, Nicolas Audebert, Valerio Marsocci, Georges Le Bellier, Liang Zeng, Dávid Kerekes, Yuru Jia, Ali Shibli, Eric Brune
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Geospatial foundation models (GFMs) have emerged as powerful tools for extracting representations from Earth observation (EO) data, but their evaluation remains inconsistent and narrow. Existing works often evaluate on suboptimal downstream datasets and tasks that are often too easy or too narrow, limiting the usefulness of the evaluations to assess the real-world applicability of GFMs. Additionally, there is a distinct lack of diversity in current evaluation protocols, which fail to account for the multiplicity of image resolutions, sensor types, and temporalities, which further complicates the assessment of GFM performance. In particular, most existing benchmarks are geographically biased toward North America and Europe, questioning the global applicability of GFMs. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PANGAEA, a standardized evaluation protocol that covers a diverse set of datasets, tasks, resolutions, sensor modalities, and temporalities. It establishes a robust and widely applicable benchmark for GFMs. We evaluate the most popular GFMs openly available on this benchmark and analyze their performance across several domains. In particular, we compare these models to supervised baselines [e.g., UNet and vanilla vision-Transformer (ViT)] and assess their effectiveness when faced with limited labeled data. Our findings highlight the limitations of GFMs under different scenarios, showing that they do not consistently outperform supervised models. PANGAEA is designed to be highly extensible, allowing for the seamless inclusion of new datasets, models, and tasks in future research. By releasing the evaluation code and benchmark, we aim to enable other researchers to replicate our experiments and build upon our work, fostering a more principled evaluation protocol for large pretrained geospatial models. The code is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/VMarsocci/pangaea-bench" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/VMarsocci/pangaea-bench</ext-link>.

IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing MagazineVol. 14(1)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), Ghent University (BE), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), European Space Research Institute (IT), University of Glasgow (GB), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.