Average glandular doses in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM)

Abstract Introduction Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM) is based on dual-energy breast exposure following intravenous administration of an iodinated contrast agent. Our study quantitatively assessed radiation dose from CEM for different breast thicknesses and compared it with doses from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and with the dose limits set in the European Guidelines. Materials and Methods We studied 200,976 exposures from 59,438 examinations performed between January 2019 and December 2023 at the National Research Institute of Oncology, using a GE Healthcare Pristina Senographe mammography unit. Radiation exposure–related data, including average glandular dose (AGD) values, were obtained from the GE DoseWatch monitoring system. Doses for CEM exposure pairs (low- and high-energy exposure) were summed. Results Out of 176,700 FFDM exposures, the acceptable dose level was exceeded only in 11 cases (less than 0.01%). For combined CEM exposures, the acceptable dose level was exceeded in 965 out of 5481 cases (17.6%). The doses in FFDM exposures and low-energy CEM exposures are similar. Average glandular dose for FFDM exposures and low-energy CEM exposures is clearly dependent on the breast thickness. In contrast, the dose for a single high-energy CEM exposure is about 0.7 mGy and shows no clear dependency on breast thickness. Acceptable dose levels for combined CEM exposures were exceeded primarily with breasts with small thicknesses, most often (70% of cases) in patients whose breasts were less than 4 cm thick. For breasts from 6 cm and larger, no CEM exposures exceeded acceptable dose levels. Conclusions Although CEM exposures are a combination of two exposures (low- and high-energy), in most cases, the doses associated with CEM exposure do not exceed limits that were originally set for single FFDM exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polish Journal of Medical Physics And Engineering
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2025-0034
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Average glandular doses in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM)

Anna Wysocka-Rabin, Witold Skrzyński, Ewa Fabiszewska, Katarzyna Pasicz
Polish Journal of Medical Physics And Engineering
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Average glandular doses in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM)

Anna Wysocka-Rabin, Witold Skrzyński, Ewa Fabiszewska, Katarzyna Pasicz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM) is based on dual-energy breast exposure following intravenous administration of an iodinated contrast agent. Our study quantitatively assessed radiation dose from CEM for different breast thicknesses and compared it with doses from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and with the dose limits set in the European Guidelines. Materials and Methods We studied 200,976 exposures from 59,438 examinations performed between January 2019 and December 2023 at the National Research Institute of Oncology, using a GE Healthcare Pristina Senographe mammography unit. Radiation exposure–related data, including average glandular dose (AGD) values, were obtained from the GE DoseWatch monitoring system. Doses for CEM exposure pairs (low- and high-energy exposure) were summed. Results Out of 176,700 FFDM exposures, the acceptable dose level was exceeded only in 11 cases (less than 0.01%). For combined CEM exposures, the acceptable dose level was exceeded in 965 out of 5481 cases (17.6%). The doses in FFDM exposures and low-energy CEM exposures are similar. Average glandular dose for FFDM exposures and low-energy CEM exposures is clearly dependent on the breast thickness. In contrast, the dose for a single high-energy CEM exposure is about 0.7 mGy and shows no clear dependency on breast thickness. Acceptable dose levels for combined CEM exposures were exceeded primarily with breasts with small thicknesses, most often (70% of cases) in patients whose breasts were less than 4 cm thick. For breasts from 6 cm and larger, no CEM exposures exceeded acceptable dose levels. Conclusions Although CEM exposures are a combination of two exposures (low- and high-energy), in most cases, the doses associated with CEM exposure do not exceed limits that were originally set for single FFDM exposures.

Polish Journal of Medical Physics And EngineeringVol. 31(4)
National Centre for Nuclear Research (PL), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.