Fair and square? Evaluating fairness of LLM-generated synthetic datasets

Machine Learning (ML) is driving advancements across various industries, including healthcare, finance, and entertainment, but it also raises significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding fairness. Biases in training data can lead to unfair outcomes, perpetuating or even amplifying existing disparities. Prior research in the Software Engineering (SE) and ML communities has developed numerous bias mitigation techniques, yet two key limitations persist: (1) most approaches intervene at later stages of development, such as after data collection or model training, rather than addressing fairness from the outset; and (2) these methods often mitigate bias without fully eliminating it, since the root issue frequently lies in the data itself. In this paper, we explore an alternative approach to mitigate unfairness: synthetic data generation , which involves creating artificial datasets that mimic the statistical properties of real-world data. We aim to assess how this approach can contribute to generating data that positively impacts the trade-off between performance and fairness by creating datasets that reduce the influence of real-world biases through synthetic feature generation. To this end, we conducted an empirical study comparing ML models trained on synthetic datasets generated by large language models to ML models trained on real-world data, evaluating performance and fairness indicators. Our results demonstrate that models trained with synthetic data, particularly those generated using simpler prompts, can achieve competitive performance while enhancing fairness. Our work suggests that synthetic data generation may be a viable approach to addressing fairness requirements in ML systems.