A flexible simulation-based predictive approach to compare hazard and risk models: An example application to seismic hazard

We propose a simulation-based approach to compare probabilistic hazard and risk models, exploiting the Bayesian prior/posterior predictive p-values (PPP) framework. The comparison can utilize an arbitrary summary statistic and can be customized to the aspects of interest, particularly the right tail, which is crucial in risk assessment. The primary benefits of our approach in comparison to existing alternatives are twofold. Firstly, it incorporates both aleatory and epistemic variability in a natural probabilistic framework, secondly, it produces interpretable measures of discrepancy. The method is demonstrated on synthetic data and two state-of-the-art seismic hazard models for Italy (MPS19, Modello di Pericolosità Sismica 2019, and ESHM20, European Seismic Hazard Model 2020). The method is applicable in any domain involving probabilistic hazard or risk models, including flood, volcanic, or multi-layer single hazard or single risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105947
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A flexible simulation-based predictive approach to compare hazard and risk models: An example application to seismic hazard

Stefano Parolai, Francesco Pauli
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

A flexible simulation-based predictive approach to compare hazard and risk models: An example application to seismic hazard

Stefano Parolai, Francesco Pauli
article en

Abstract

We propose a simulation-based approach to compare probabilistic hazard and risk models, exploiting the Bayesian prior/posterior predictive p-values (PPP) framework. The comparison can utilize an arbitrary summary statistic and can be customized to the aspects of interest, particularly the right tail, which is crucial in risk assessment. The primary benefits of our approach in comparison to existing alternatives are twofold. Firstly, it incorporates both aleatory and epistemic variability in a natural probabilistic framework, secondly, it produces interpretable measures of discrepancy. The method is demonstrated on synthetic data and two state-of-the-art seismic hazard models for Italy (MPS19, Modello di Pericolosità Sismica 2019, and ESHM20, European Seismic Hazard Model 2020). The method is applicable in any domain involving probabilistic hazard or risk models, including flood, volcanic, or multi-layer single hazard or single risk assessments.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 132
University of Trieste (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.