Civil Society Strikes Back: How Global South Coalitions Are Shaping Corporate Accountability in the Age of Mandatory Due Diligence

Abstract This article examines how civil society organizations (CSOs) in the Global South perceive and leverage European supply chain regulations to hold companies accountable for negative externalities in their global value chains. While previous studies highlight perceptions of these regulations as a unilateral European imposition that marginalizes Global South stakeholders, the regulatory agency of CSOs in producing countries remains underexplored. We develop an analytical framework for studying this agency across different stages of accountability. Drawing on extensive fieldwork in Brazil, we show how diverse Brazilian CSOs largely support mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence regulations. Despite differing political agendas and experiences with transnational governance, they shape outcomes by participating in lawmaking, improving traceability and monitoring, and contributing to enforcement. Although long-term effects remain uncertain, we identify two intermediate consequences: mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence has fostered institutional innovations in Brazil and strengthened collaborations between international and national CSOs. This study advances debates on corporate accountability and global supply chain governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.28
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil Society Strikes Back: How Global South Coalitions Are Shaping Corporate Accountability in the Age of Mandatory Due Diligence

Maria‐Therese Gustafsson, Almut Schilling‐Vacaflor
Global Environmental Politics
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Civil Society Strikes Back: How Global South Coalitions Are Shaping Corporate Accountability in the Age of Mandatory Due Diligence

Maria‐Therese Gustafsson, Almut Schilling‐Vacaflor
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how civil society organizations (CSOs) in the Global South perceive and leverage European supply chain regulations to hold companies accountable for negative externalities in their global value chains. While previous studies highlight perceptions of these regulations as a unilateral European imposition that marginalizes Global South stakeholders, the regulatory agency of CSOs in producing countries remains underexplored. We develop an analytical framework for studying this agency across different stages of accountability. Drawing on extensive fieldwork in Brazil, we show how diverse Brazilian CSOs largely support mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence regulations. Despite differing political agendas and experiences with transnational governance, they shape outcomes by participating in lawmaking, improving traceability and monitoring, and contributing to enforcement. Although long-term effects remain uncertain, we identify two intermediate consequences: mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence has fostered institutional innovations in Brazil and strengthened collaborations between international and national CSOs. This study advances debates on corporate accountability and global supply chain governance.

Global Environmental Politics
Zero to Three (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.