ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks

Pooling strategies are fundamental to convolutional neural networks, shaping the trade-off between accuracy, robustness to spatial variations, and computational efficiency in modern visual recognition systems. In this paper, we present and validate ECA110-Pooling, a novel rule-based pooling operator inspired by elementary cellular automata. We conduct a systematic comparative study, benchmarking ECA110-Pooling against conventional pooling methods (MaxPooling, AveragePooling, MedianPooling, MinPooling, KernelPooling) as well as state-of-the-art (SOTA) architectures. Experiments on three benchmark datasets—ImageNet (subset), CIFAR-10, and Fashion-MNIST—across training horizons ranging from 20 to 50,000 epochs show that ECA110-Pooling consistently achieves higher Top-1 accuracy, lower error rates, and stronger F1-scores than traditional pooling operators, while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to MaxPooling. Moreover, when compared with SOTA models, ECA110-Pooling delivers competitive accuracy with substantially fewer parameters and reduced training time. These results establish ECA110-Pooling as a principled and validated approach to image classification, bridging the gap between fixed pooling schemes and complex deep architectures. Its interpretable, rule-based design highlights both theoretical significance and practical applicability in contexts that demand a balance of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks

Doru Constantin, Costel Bălcău
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks

Doru Constantin, Costel Bălcău
article en

Abstract

Pooling strategies are fundamental to convolutional neural networks, shaping the trade-off between accuracy, robustness to spatial variations, and computational efficiency in modern visual recognition systems. In this paper, we present and validate ECA110-Pooling, a novel rule-based pooling operator inspired by elementary cellular automata. We conduct a systematic comparative study, benchmarking ECA110-Pooling against conventional pooling methods (MaxPooling, AveragePooling, MedianPooling, MinPooling, KernelPooling) as well as state-of-the-art (SOTA) architectures. Experiments on three benchmark datasets—ImageNet (subset), CIFAR-10, and Fashion-MNIST—across training horizons ranging from 20 to 50,000 epochs show that ECA110-Pooling consistently achieves higher Top-1 accuracy, lower error rates, and stronger F1-scores than traditional pooling operators, while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to MaxPooling. Moreover, when compared with SOTA models, ECA110-Pooling delivers competitive accuracy with substantially fewer parameters and reduced training time. These results establish ECA110-Pooling as a principled and validated approach to image classification, bridging the gap between fixed pooling schemes and complex deep architectures. Its interpretable, rule-based design highlights both theoretical significance and practical applicability in contexts that demand a balance of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability.

Big Data and Cognitive ComputingVol. 9(12)
University of Pitesti (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.