Leveraging LLMs for User Rating Prediction from Textual Reviews: A Hospitality Data Annotation Case Study

The proliferation of user-generated content in today’s digital landscape has further increased dependence on online reviews as a source for decision-making in the hospitality industry. There has been an increasing interest in automating this decision-support mechanism through recommender systems. However, this process often requires a large amount of labelled corpus to train an effective algorithm, necessitating the use of human annotators for developing training data, where this is lacking. Although the manual annotation can be helpful in enriching the training corpus, it can, on the one hand, introduce errors and annotator bias, including subjectivity and cultural bias, which can affect the quality of the data and fairness in the model. This paper examines the alignment of ratings derived from different annotation sources and the original ratings provided by customers, which are treated as the ground truth. The paper compares the predictions from Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models against ratings assigned by Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers. The GPT 4o annotation outputs closely mirror the original ratings, given its strong positive correlation (0.703) with the latter. The GPT-3.5 Turbo and MTurk showed weaker correlations (0.663 and 0.15, respectively) than GPT 4o. The potential cause of the large difference between original ratings and MTurk (largely driven by human perception) lies in the inherent challenges of subjectivity, quantitative bias, and variability in context comprehension. These findings suggest that the use of advanced models such as GPT-4o can significantly reduce the potential bias and variability introduced by Amazon MTurk annotators, thus improving the prediction accuracy of ratings with actual user sentiment as expressed in textual reviews. Moreover, with the per-annotation cost of an LLM shown to be thirty times cheaper than MTurk, our proposed LLM-based textual review annotation approach will be cost-effective for the hospitality industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16121059
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging LLMs for User Rating Prediction from Textual Reviews: A Hospitality Data Annotation Case Study

Chinedu Pascal Ezenkwu, Ebuka Ibeke, Patricia Nnanna, Olasoji Amujo
Information
Recommender Systems and Techniques
article

Leveraging LLMs for User Rating Prediction from Textual Reviews: A Hospitality Data Annotation Case Study

Chinedu Pascal Ezenkwu, Ebuka Ibeke, Patricia Nnanna, Olasoji Amujo
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of user-generated content in today’s digital landscape has further increased dependence on online reviews as a source for decision-making in the hospitality industry. There has been an increasing interest in automating this decision-support mechanism through recommender systems. However, this process often requires a large amount of labelled corpus to train an effective algorithm, necessitating the use of human annotators for developing training data, where this is lacking. Although the manual annotation can be helpful in enriching the training corpus, it can, on the one hand, introduce errors and annotator bias, including subjectivity and cultural bias, which can affect the quality of the data and fairness in the model. This paper examines the alignment of ratings derived from different annotation sources and the original ratings provided by customers, which are treated as the ground truth. The paper compares the predictions from Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models against ratings assigned by Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers. The GPT 4o annotation outputs closely mirror the original ratings, given its strong positive correlation (0.703) with the latter. The GPT-3.5 Turbo and MTurk showed weaker correlations (0.663 and 0.15, respectively) than GPT 4o. The potential cause of the large difference between original ratings and MTurk (largely driven by human perception) lies in the inherent challenges of subjectivity, quantitative bias, and variability in context comprehension. These findings suggest that the use of advanced models such as GPT-4o can significantly reduce the potential bias and variability introduced by Amazon MTurk annotators, thus improving the prediction accuracy of ratings with actual user sentiment as expressed in textual reviews. Moreover, with the per-annotation cost of an LLM shown to be thirty times cheaper than MTurk, our proposed LLM-based textual review annotation approach will be cost-effective for the hospitality industry.

InformationVol. 16(12)
Marks and Spencer (United Kingdom) (GB), Robert Gordon University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.