Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs

Social networks shape how humans form opinions, exchange information, and organize collectively. As large language models (LLMs) become embedded in social and professional environments, it is critical to understand whether their interactions resemble human network dynamics. We introduce a framework to study the network formation behaviors of multiple LLM agents and benchmark them against human decisions. Across synthetic and real-world settings, including friendship, telecommunication, and employment networks, LLMs reproduce core microlevel principles (preferential attachment, triadic closure, and homophily), and macrolevel properties (community structure, small-world effects). Their emphasis on these principles adapts to context: for example, LLMs favor homophily in friendship networks but heterophily in organizational settings, mirroring patterns of social mobility. A controlled survey shows strong alignment between LLM and human link-formation decisions. These results highlight LLMs' potential as tools for social simulation and synthetic data generation, while underscoring risks of bias and fairness in AI systems that interact with human networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf317
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs

Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan
2 citations
PNAS Nexus
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
2.65
article

Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs

Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social networks shape how humans form opinions, exchange information, and organize collectively. As large language models (LLMs) become embedded in social and professional environments, it is critical to understand whether their interactions resemble human network dynamics. We introduce a framework to study the network formation behaviors of multiple LLM agents and benchmark them against human decisions. Across synthetic and real-world settings, including friendship, telecommunication, and employment networks, LLMs reproduce core microlevel principles (preferential attachment, triadic closure, and homophily), and macrolevel properties (community structure, small-world effects). Their emphasis on these principles adapts to context: for example, LLMs favor homophily in friendship networks but heterophily in organizational settings, mirroring patterns of social mobility. A controlled survey shows strong alignment between LLM and human link-formation decisions. These results highlight LLMs' potential as tools for social simulation and synthetic data generation, while underscoring risks of bias and fairness in AI systems that interact with human networks.

PNAS NexusVol. 4(12)
Cornell University (US), Arizona State University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Network formation and dynamics among multi-LLMs — Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan · PNAS Nexus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS