Estimating Jezero Crater Rock Density and Strength Using Perseverance Drill Data: Implications for Future Mars Missions and Analog Mars Studies

Abstract Although no rovers are currently capable of directly measuring rock density and strength, these properties are highly valuable to better understand the types of rocks that are being investigated by a rover, as well as the conditions on Mars during and after rock formation. Here, we use engineering data collected by the corer on the Perseverance rover to infer rock density and strength (unconfined compressive strength, or UCS) by comparing drill data for martian rocks to drill data for well‐characterized analog materials that were cored using the same equipment on Earth. We calculate the energy expended by the drill to core each rock and find discrete correlations between both energy and measured rock density, as well as energy and strength of the analog materials. These correlations are then used to calculate likely values for density and strength of the rocks cored on Mars. Potential homogeneity of the martian samples is also indicated by changes in the drill response during coring. Overall, we find a wide range of UCS and density for the martian rocks. Endmembers are consistent with rover team interpretation as igneous (high strength and density) and sedimentary (low strength and density) lithologies. The extraordinarily low strength and density of the sedimentary materials are further consistent with greater porosity resulting from generally sparse cementation on Mars. The majority of rocks interpreted as igneous by team members, however, were also substantially weaker and less dense than expected based on their composition and texture, suggesting that interpretations may need refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025je009097
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Jezero Crater Rock Density and Strength Using Perseverance Drill Data: Implications for Future Mars Missions and Analog Mars Studies

James Tuggle, Kyle W. Kaplan, Kristopher Kriechbaum, Elizabeth R. Duffy et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
article

Estimating Jezero Crater Rock Density and Strength Using Perseverance Drill Data: Implications for Future Mars Missions and Analog Mars Studies

James Tuggle, Kyle W. Kaplan, Kristopher Kriechbaum, Elizabeth R. Duffy, Linda C. Kah, Lori Shiraishi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although no rovers are currently capable of directly measuring rock density and strength, these properties are highly valuable to better understand the types of rocks that are being investigated by a rover, as well as the conditions on Mars during and after rock formation. Here, we use engineering data collected by the corer on the Perseverance rover to infer rock density and strength (unconfined compressive strength, or UCS) by comparing drill data for martian rocks to drill data for well‐characterized analog materials that were cored using the same equipment on Earth. We calculate the energy expended by the drill to core each rock and find discrete correlations between both energy and measured rock density, as well as energy and strength of the analog materials. These correlations are then used to calculate likely values for density and strength of the rocks cored on Mars. Potential homogeneity of the martian samples is also indicated by changes in the drill response during coring. Overall, we find a wide range of UCS and density for the martian rocks. Endmembers are consistent with rover team interpretation as igneous (high strength and density) and sedimentary (low strength and density) lithologies. The extraordinarily low strength and density of the sedimentary materials are further consistent with greater porosity resulting from generally sparse cementation on Mars. The majority of rocks interpreted as igneous by team members, however, were also substantially weaker and less dense than expected based on their composition and texture, suggesting that interpretations may need refinement.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(12)
California Institute of Technology (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.