The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres

Herein we shall argue for the utility of “spacetime geodesy”, a point of view where one delays as long as possible worrying about dynamical equations, in favour of the maximal utilization of both symmetries and geometrical features. This closely parallels Weinberg’s distinction between “cosmography” and “cosmology”, wherein maximal utilization of both the symmetries and geometrical features of Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) spacetimes is emphasized. This “spacetime geodesy” point of view is particularly useful in those situations where, for one reason or another, the dynamical equations of motion are either uncertain or completely unknown. Several specific examples are discussed—we shall illustrate what can be done by considering the physics implications of demanding spatially isotropic Ricci tensors as a way of automatically implementing the (isotropic) perfect fluid condition, without committing to a specific equation of state. We also consider the structure of the Weyl tensor in spherical symmetry, with and without the (isotropic) perfect fluid condition, and relate this to the notion of “complexity”. In closing, we indicate some ways in which these considerations might be further generalized to more physically complicated (and technically very much more complicated) situations such as axisymmetric spacetimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17122043
Primary Topic
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres

Matt Visser, Christopher Simmonds
Symmetry
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
article

The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres

Matt Visser, Christopher Simmonds
article en

Abstract

Herein we shall argue for the utility of “spacetime geodesy”, a point of view where one delays as long as possible worrying about dynamical equations, in favour of the maximal utilization of both symmetries and geometrical features. This closely parallels Weinberg’s distinction between “cosmography” and “cosmology”, wherein maximal utilization of both the symmetries and geometrical features of Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) spacetimes is emphasized. This “spacetime geodesy” point of view is particularly useful in those situations where, for one reason or another, the dynamical equations of motion are either uncertain or completely unknown. Several specific examples are discussed—we shall illustrate what can be done by considering the physics implications of demanding spatially isotropic Ricci tensors as a way of automatically implementing the (isotropic) perfect fluid condition, without committing to a specific equation of state. We also consider the structure of the Weyl tensor in spherical symmetry, with and without the (isotropic) perfect fluid condition, and relate this to the notion of “complexity”. In closing, we indicate some ways in which these considerations might be further generalized to more physically complicated (and technically very much more complicated) situations such as axisymmetric spacetimes.

SymmetryVol. 17(12)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Spacetime Geodesy of Perfect Fluid Spheres — Matt Visser, Christopher Simmonds · Symmetry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS