Effects of Sports Flooring on Peak Ground Reaction Forces During Bilateral Drop Landings

With continued advancement in flooring technology, modular sports flooring tiles have emerged as a potential alternative flooring solution for sports performance. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding their effects on ground reaction forces in landing tasks (GRFs). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of flooring surface on peak GRFs during bilateral drop landings. Eighteen physically active adults (10 males, 8 females) completed three bilateral drop landings from a 50 cm height across each of three flooring types: modular sport tiles, athletic track, and bare force plates, measuring contacts from both the left and right limb. GRFs were captured using two in-ground force platforms, normalised to body mass, and then analysed using a linear mixed-effects model with post-hoc comparisons where significant interactions were recorded. Peak anterior GRFs were significantly lower in the modular tiles compared with athletic sports track and bare metal surfaces (p < 0.001, η2p ≥ 0.430). Additionally, anterior (p = 0.048, η2p = 0.040), lateral (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.280), and vertical (p = 0.001, η2p = 0.100) GRFs were significantly greater in the right limb compared with the left limb within each flooring surface condition. Future research should investigate sport-specific movement patterns and long-term adaptations associated with training on modular surfaces to assess their potential role in enhancing performance and mitigating injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17122045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Sports Flooring on Peak Ground Reaction Forces During Bilateral Drop Landings

Kane Middleton, Alexandra H. Roberts, Marcus Dunn, Nicholas A. Busuttil et al.
1 citations
Symmetry
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
article

Effects of Sports Flooring on Peak Ground Reaction Forces During Bilateral Drop Landings

Kane Middleton, Alexandra H. Roberts, Marcus Dunn, Nicholas A. Busuttil, Anthony J. Viglione
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With continued advancement in flooring technology, modular sports flooring tiles have emerged as a potential alternative flooring solution for sports performance. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding their effects on ground reaction forces in landing tasks (GRFs). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of flooring surface on peak GRFs during bilateral drop landings. Eighteen physically active adults (10 males, 8 females) completed three bilateral drop landings from a 50 cm height across each of three flooring types: modular sport tiles, athletic track, and bare force plates, measuring contacts from both the left and right limb. GRFs were captured using two in-ground force platforms, normalised to body mass, and then analysed using a linear mixed-effects model with post-hoc comparisons where significant interactions were recorded. Peak anterior GRFs were significantly lower in the modular tiles compared with athletic sports track and bare metal surfaces (p < 0.001, η2p ≥ 0.430). Additionally, anterior (p = 0.048, η2p = 0.040), lateral (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.280), and vertical (p = 0.001, η2p = 0.100) GRFs were significantly greater in the right limb compared with the left limb within each flooring surface condition. Future research should investigate sport-specific movement patterns and long-term adaptations associated with training on modular surfaces to assess their potential role in enhancing performance and mitigating injuries.

SymmetryVol. 17(12)
La Trobe University (AU), Heriot-Watt University (GB), The Performance Institute (US), Victoria University (AU)
Australian Government, La Trobe University
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.