Science capital and accessible museum practices: applying double lenses in a case study with blind and deaf visitors in the Brazilian context

This exploratory and qualitative research aims to investigate how Science Capital is connected with accessibility. The study participants were adults, self-identified as blind or Deaf users of Brazilian Sign Language. They were invited to a guided visit at an exhibition at a science museum in Brazil, where data was collected through interviews, observations, and questionnaires. After conducting a thematic analysis, three main categories emerged: (1) Mechanisms of In/Exclusion in Museums and Science, (2) Scientific Content in Context and (3) Attitudes, Values, and Science-Related Dispositions. In each category, evidence shows correlations between accessibility indicators and dimensions of Science Capital. The results from the Science Capital Index questionnaires revealed changes in all participants' scores, with one of the most significant changes being how participants understood what it means to be a scientist. Our study advances previous research that used the Science Capital model by addressing its limitations when applied to people with disabilities. It also challenges the original British/Eurocentric design by proposing a more inclusive approach that considers structural inequalities and contextual barriers, particularly in the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1681129
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science capital and accessible museum practices: applying double lenses in a case study with blind and deaf visitors in the Brazilian context

Alessandra Fernandes Bizerra, Gabriela Sehnem Heck, Jéssica Norberto Rocha, José Luís Schifino Ferraro
Frontiers in Education
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Science capital and accessible museum practices: applying double lenses in a case study with blind and deaf visitors in the Brazilian context

Alessandra Fernandes Bizerra, Gabriela Sehnem Heck, Jéssica Norberto Rocha, José Luís Schifino Ferraro
article en

Abstract

This exploratory and qualitative research aims to investigate how Science Capital is connected with accessibility. The study participants were adults, self-identified as blind or Deaf users of Brazilian Sign Language. They were invited to a guided visit at an exhibition at a science museum in Brazil, where data was collected through interviews, observations, and questionnaires. After conducting a thematic analysis, three main categories emerged: (1) Mechanisms of In/Exclusion in Museums and Science, (2) Scientific Content in Context and (3) Attitudes, Values, and Science-Related Dispositions. In each category, evidence shows correlations between accessibility indicators and dimensions of Science Capital. The results from the Science Capital Index questionnaires revealed changes in all participants' scores, with one of the most significant changes being how participants understood what it means to be a scientist. Our study advances previous research that used the Science Capital model by addressing its limitations when applied to people with disabilities. It also challenges the original British/Eurocentric design by proposing a more inclusive approach that considers structural inequalities and contextual barriers, particularly in the Global South.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Museum of Science (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Fundação CECIERJ (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Insper (BR)
University of Oxford, Newcastle University, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.