Endoscopic Versus Surgical Management for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Walled-Off Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis and walled-off necrosis are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The evolution from open necrosectomy to minimally invasive and endoscopic strategies has improved outcomes, yet complex cases may require multimodal approaches. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to 15 July 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Only RCTs directly comparing endoscopic and surgical necrosectomy were included. We analyzed RCTs enrolling adults with infected necrotizing pancreatitis or symptomatic/infected walled-off necrosis, irrespective of etiology, comparing endoscopic step-up strategies with surgical or minimally invasive step-up approaches. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, hospital stay, long-term pancreatic function, and quality of life. <i>Results</i>: Six RCTs comprising 1045 patients were identified. Endoscopic necrosectomy demonstrated comparable mortality to surgical or minimally invasive step-up approaches (8-18% vs. 6-15%) but significantly reduced rates of pancreatic fistula (8% vs. 34%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), new-onset organ failure, and, in several studies, shortened hospital stay. Median timing of intervention ranged from 4 to 6 weeks after pancreatitis onset, although some trials reported earlier or delayed drainage, highlighting variability in clinical practice. Long-term endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, as well as quality of life, were largely similar between techniques, although early recovery and physical functioning scores favored endoscopy in selected studies. <i>Conclusions</i>: Endoscopic necrosectomy offers a safer peri-procedural profile compared with surgical approaches, but complex or anatomically unfavorable necrosis may still require surgical intervention. Individualized multimodal management, informed by evolving evidence, represents the cornerstone of modern care for patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis and walled-off necrosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61122149
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Versus Surgical Management for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Walled-Off Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nicolò de Manzini, Paola Germani, Manuela Mastronardi, Alan Biloslavo et al.
Medicina
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Endoscopic Versus Surgical Management for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Walled-Off Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nicolò de Manzini, Paola Germani, Manuela Mastronardi, Alan Biloslavo, Margherita Sandano, Alessio Giordano, Sara Crociato, Giada Moghnie, Chiara Menghini
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis and walled-off necrosis are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The evolution from open necrosectomy to minimally invasive and endoscopic strategies has improved outcomes, yet complex cases may require multimodal approaches. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to 15 July 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Only RCTs directly comparing endoscopic and surgical necrosectomy were included. We analyzed RCTs enrolling adults with infected necrotizing pancreatitis or symptomatic/infected walled-off necrosis, irrespective of etiology, comparing endoscopic step-up strategies with surgical or minimally invasive step-up approaches. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, hospital stay, long-term pancreatic function, and quality of life. <i>Results</i>: Six RCTs comprising 1045 patients were identified. Endoscopic necrosectomy demonstrated comparable mortality to surgical or minimally invasive step-up approaches (8-18% vs. 6-15%) but significantly reduced rates of pancreatic fistula (8% vs. 34%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), new-onset organ failure, and, in several studies, shortened hospital stay. Median timing of intervention ranged from 4 to 6 weeks after pancreatitis onset, although some trials reported earlier or delayed drainage, highlighting variability in clinical practice. Long-term endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, as well as quality of life, were largely similar between techniques, although early recovery and physical functioning scores favored endoscopy in selected studies. <i>Conclusions</i>: Endoscopic necrosectomy offers a safer peri-procedural profile compared with surgical approaches, but complex or anatomically unfavorable necrosis may still require surgical intervention. Individualized multimodal management, informed by evolving evidence, represents the cornerstone of modern care for patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis and walled-off necrosis.

MedicinaVol. 61(12)
University of Trieste (IT), Ospedale di Cattinara (IT), Ospedale San Carlo (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.