Gabrielius Landsbergis’ Foreign Policy Doctrine (2020–2024): Ideas, Strategic Priorities and Diplomatic Practice

The aim of this article is to evaluate the tenure of Lithuania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Gabrielius Landsbergis, through the lens of successes and failures on the international stage with selected countries. From a research perspective, Landsbergis’s term at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will be analyzed in the context of continuity and change within Lithuanian foreign policy, framed by the neo-idealism approach. This analysis revealed that despite the lack of strategic guidelines for Lithuania’s foreign policy, it was perceived by external stakeholders as relatively predictable and values-driven, particularly with regard to specific actions taken by the Lithuanian government towards China, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Taiwan.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47459/lasr.2025.23.5
Primary Topic
Central European and Russian historical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gabrielius Landsbergis’ Foreign Policy Doctrine (2020–2024): Ideas, Strategic Priorities and Diplomatic Practice

Martinas Malużinas
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review
Central European and Russian historical studies
article

Gabrielius Landsbergis’ Foreign Policy Doctrine (2020–2024): Ideas, Strategic Priorities and Diplomatic Practice

Martinas Malużinas
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate the tenure of Lithuania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Gabrielius Landsbergis, through the lens of successes and failures on the international stage with selected countries. From a research perspective, Landsbergis’s term at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will be analyzed in the context of continuity and change within Lithuanian foreign policy, framed by the neo-idealism approach. This analysis revealed that despite the lack of strategic guidelines for Lithuania’s foreign policy, it was perceived by external stakeholders as relatively predictable and values-driven, particularly with regard to specific actions taken by the Lithuanian government towards China, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Taiwan.

Lithuanian Annual Strategic ReviewVol. 23(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Central European and Russian historical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.