The political economy of civil wars and the future of UN peacekeeping

The article examines the UN’s encounter with the political economy of civil war, focusing on the lessons from the large multidimensional operations that have consumed the bulk of the UN’s peacekeeping attention, resources, and manpower since 1999. It argues that the UN has proven itself structurally and politically ill-equipped to undertake large-scale peace operations aimed at transforming societies riven by internal conflict. Acknowledging this does not mean that the UN has no role to play in efforts to address internal conflict, even in radically changed geopolitical circumstances. A shift in the focus and priorities of the UN’s engagement is required, however. The aim of any such shift should be to reinvigorate the UN’s capacity for engaging strategically with the politics of conflict through smaller and more agile missions, presences, and offices, structuring activities in support of political processes that are most likely to influence the balance of incentives in favour of peace and violence reduction. Crucially, this too will require engagement with, and a profound understanding of, the political economy of civil war on the part of the UN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Security and Development
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2025.2588669
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political economy of civil wars and the future of UN peacekeeping

Mats Berdal
1 citations
Conflict Security and Development
Peacebuilding and International Security
4.20
article

The political economy of civil wars and the future of UN peacekeeping

Mats Berdal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the UN’s encounter with the political economy of civil war, focusing on the lessons from the large multidimensional operations that have consumed the bulk of the UN’s peacekeeping attention, resources, and manpower since 1999. It argues that the UN has proven itself structurally and politically ill-equipped to undertake large-scale peace operations aimed at transforming societies riven by internal conflict. Acknowledging this does not mean that the UN has no role to play in efforts to address internal conflict, even in radically changed geopolitical circumstances. A shift in the focus and priorities of the UN’s engagement is required, however. The aim of any such shift should be to reinvigorate the UN’s capacity for engaging strategically with the politics of conflict through smaller and more agile missions, presences, and offices, structuring activities in support of political processes that are most likely to influence the balance of incentives in favour of peace and violence reduction. Crucially, this too will require engagement with, and a profound understanding of, the political economy of civil war on the part of the UN.

Conflict Security and DevelopmentVol. 25(6)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Peacebuilding and International Security
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.