A decade of systematic review services: experiences, challenges, and lessons learned from a health sciences librarian’s perspective

Health sciences librarians play a critical role in supporting evidence synthesis, mostly systematic and scoping reviews. This paper reflects on the author's decade of evidence synthesis services (2015-2025). During this time, the author provided extensive support to the health sciences researchers, faculty, students, and staff at a large research university through consultation and collaboration on systematic and scoping reviews. The author discusses the roles undertaken, practice guidelines adhered to, information sources frequently searched, SR tools utilized, challenges encountered, and lessons learned throughout the experiences. The paper concludes with some recommendations for enhancing systematic review services in health sciences libraries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2025.2595571
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A decade of systematic review services: experiences, challenges, and lessons learned from a health sciences librarian’s perspective

Yingting Zhang
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

A decade of systematic review services: experiences, challenges, and lessons learned from a health sciences librarian’s perspective

Yingting Zhang
article en

Abstract

Health sciences librarians play a critical role in supporting evidence synthesis, mostly systematic and scoping reviews. This paper reflects on the author's decade of evidence synthesis services (2015-2025). During this time, the author provided extensive support to the health sciences researchers, faculty, students, and staff at a large research university through consultation and collaboration on systematic and scoping reviews. The author discusses the roles undertaken, practice guidelines adhered to, information sources frequently searched, SR tools utilized, challenges encountered, and lessons learned throughout the experiences. The paper concludes with some recommendations for enhancing systematic review services in health sciences libraries.

Medical Reference Services QuarterlyVol. 44(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (US), Johnson University (US), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A decade of systematic review services: experiences, challenges, and lessons learned from a health sciences librarian’s perspective — Yingting Zhang · Medical Reference Services Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS