Inferring Endozoochory From Ingestion to Germination Through Biological Filters: Brown Bear Feces as a Case Study

Diaspore (e.g., seed and spore) dispersal is recognized as a key mechanism in plant dynamics, including endozoochory, which can be a risky journey for diaspores. Endozoochory is achieved when diaspores are consumed and may germinate after the mastication, the gut and fecal matrix passage, all representing filters for diaspores. Nevertheless, endozoochory is a highly studied mechanism through numerous methods, notably based on the observation of frugivorous behavior, diaspores retrieved in feces or germination experiments. However, most of those methods consider partially the endozoochorous filters (ingestion, mastication, gut, feces). Hence, the combined effect of the methods and filters consideration may lead to biased inference of endozoochory. In this study, we used a collection of 52 brown bear (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) feces to highlight five methods inferring endozoochory. Two methods consider the ingestion filter and used metabarcoding of fecal eDNA to identify fleshy fruits (i) or plants during fruiting periods (ii). The third method (iii) was based on the intact propagules retrieved in feces, considering ingestion and mastication filters. Another method (iv) was based on the germination from disaggregated feces, considering up to the gut passage filter. The last method (v) was based on the germination from aggregated feces, considering the four filters. We compared the number of taxa, the community and the plant life forms inferred among methods. We inferred the largest number of taxa in method (iii), but the germination-based methods inferred the most diverse plant life forms. We identify few shared taxa among methods. The metabarcoding-based methods might be an interesting tool as a first approximation of endozoochory while detailing the diet. The method (v) appeared as the most reliable. Overall, we invite future studies to mitigate their interpretations according to the filters of endozoochory considered and plant detectability related to the method used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72589
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inferring Endozoochory From Ingestion to Germination Through Biological Filters: Brown Bear Feces as a Case Study

Mélanie Roy, Tanguy Daufresne, Christophe Baltzinger, Cécile Vanpé et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Inferring Endozoochory From Ingestion to Germination Through Biological Filters: Brown Bear Feces as a Case Study

Mélanie Roy, Tanguy Daufresne, Christophe Baltzinger, Cécile Vanpé, Adélie Chevalier, Jérôme Sentilles, Grégoire Pauly, Yannis Clavier
article en

Abstract

Diaspore (e.g., seed and spore) dispersal is recognized as a key mechanism in plant dynamics, including endozoochory, which can be a risky journey for diaspores. Endozoochory is achieved when diaspores are consumed and may germinate after the mastication, the gut and fecal matrix passage, all representing filters for diaspores. Nevertheless, endozoochory is a highly studied mechanism through numerous methods, notably based on the observation of frugivorous behavior, diaspores retrieved in feces or germination experiments. However, most of those methods consider partially the endozoochorous filters (ingestion, mastication, gut, feces). Hence, the combined effect of the methods and filters consideration may lead to biased inference of endozoochory. In this study, we used a collection of 52 brown bear (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) feces to highlight five methods inferring endozoochory. Two methods consider the ingestion filter and used metabarcoding of fecal eDNA to identify fleshy fruits (i) or plants during fruiting periods (ii). The third method (iii) was based on the intact propagules retrieved in feces, considering ingestion and mastication filters. Another method (iv) was based on the germination from disaggregated feces, considering up to the gut passage filter. The last method (v) was based on the germination from aggregated feces, considering the four filters. We compared the number of taxa, the community and the plant life forms inferred among methods. We inferred the largest number of taxa in method (iii), but the germination-based methods inferred the most diverse plant life forms. We identify few shared taxa among methods. The metabarcoding-based methods might be an interesting tool as a first approximation of endozoochory while detailing the diet. The method (v) appeared as the most reliable. Overall, we invite future studies to mitigate their interpretations according to the filters of endozoochory considered and plant detectability related to the method used.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(12)
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Ecologie fonctionnelle & biogéochimie des sols & des agro-systèmes (FR), French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (FR), Centre d’Etudes Politiques Et sociaLes (FR), Instituto Franco-Argentino sobre Estudios de Clima y sus Impactos (AR)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Office Français de la Biodiversité, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.