Geometric Parameter Optimization of 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays Based on Comprehensive Mechanical Testing and Failure Analysis

This study provides a systematic mechanical characterization and manufacturing analysis of stereolithography-printed microneedle arrays across six geometric designs (300-400 μm diameter and three aspect ratios: 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1) and three array configurations (1 × 1, 5 × 5, 10 × 10). Compression testing to 50 N revealed geometry-dependent optimization: low-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 1, 4, 5) exhibited superior performance in high-density arrays (10 × 10), while high-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 2, 3) performed better as single needles. Manufacturing success rates increased significantly with array density: from 44.2% (95% CI: 41.1-47.3%) for single needles to 67.3% (95% CI: 63.2-71.4%) for 10 × 10 arrays, with 400 μm diameter designs showing higher reliability. Two-way ANOVA confirmed significant effects of both geometric design [F(5, 72) = 145.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.91] and array configuration [F(2, 72) = 78.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.68] on compressive displacement. Design 5 (400 μm diameter, 3:1 aspect ratio) in a 10 × 10 format exhibited optimal mechanical characteristics, including controlled displacement (0.578 ± 0.036 mm), a high safety factor (SF = 13.32), and a superior manufacturing yield. These findings provide quantitative design guidelines for optimizing 3D-printed microneedle arrays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Micromachines
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16121377
Primary Topic
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Parameter Optimization of 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays Based on Comprehensive Mechanical Testing and Failure Analysis

Faisal Khaled Aldawood, Hussain F. Abualkhair
Micromachines
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
article

Geometric Parameter Optimization of 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays Based on Comprehensive Mechanical Testing and Failure Analysis

Faisal Khaled Aldawood, Hussain F. Abualkhair
article en

Abstract

This study provides a systematic mechanical characterization and manufacturing analysis of stereolithography-printed microneedle arrays across six geometric designs (300-400 μm diameter and three aspect ratios: 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1) and three array configurations (1 × 1, 5 × 5, 10 × 10). Compression testing to 50 N revealed geometry-dependent optimization: low-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 1, 4, 5) exhibited superior performance in high-density arrays (10 × 10), while high-aspect-ratio designs (Designs 2, 3) performed better as single needles. Manufacturing success rates increased significantly with array density: from 44.2% (95% CI: 41.1-47.3%) for single needles to 67.3% (95% CI: 63.2-71.4%) for 10 × 10 arrays, with 400 μm diameter designs showing higher reliability. Two-way ANOVA confirmed significant effects of both geometric design [F(5, 72) = 145.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.91] and array configuration [F(2, 72) = 78.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.68] on compressive displacement. Design 5 (400 μm diameter, 3:1 aspect ratio) in a 10 × 10 format exhibited optimal mechanical characteristics, including controlled displacement (0.578 ± 0.036 mm), a high safety factor (SF = 13.32), and a superior manufacturing yield. These findings provide quantitative design guidelines for optimizing 3D-printed microneedle arrays.

MicromachinesVol. 16(12)
Taif University (SA), University of Bisha (SA)
University of Bisha
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.