Genetic Assignment at Different Geographical Levels: A Case Study in a Forest Tree Species ( <i>Pinus pinaster</i> Ait.) Using <scp>SNP</scp> Markers

Genetic markers can assist in the identification of the stock origin in different organisms. Comparative studies of forest tree provenances have demonstrated that forest tree populations differ in performance across environments and at multiple geographic levels: populations nested within regions nested within gene pools. These levels are critical for conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources: regions of provenance are key units for seed marketing, while populations guide reproductive material collection under most seed regulations. Despite their potential, genetic methods have rarely been applied to identify forest tree origins due to methodological (sufficient number of highly discriminatory markers) and practical (construction of a baseline composed of a representative selection of samples) challenges. In our study, we analyzed a genomic dataset comprising 10,185 SNPs from 1579 samples of <i>Pinus pinaster</i>, a species with strong population structure, across 86 populations, 45 regions of provenance, and 10 gene pools, to discriminate among these hierarchical levels and assign individuals to them. We used two software packages to evaluate the reliability of our baseline dataset (i.e., reference data) for genetic discrimination and assignment: <i>RUBIAS</i>, which performs genetic stock identification and associated tasks, and <i>assignPOP</i>, implementing a supervised machine-learning genetic-assignment framework. Using numerical validation analyses, we assessed their suitability and limitations for origin inference at each geographical level. Our results indicate that origin assignment is reliable in <i>P. pinaster</i> at the gene pool and region of provenance levels, but less so at the population level, provided that the 10 K SNP markers and a comprehensive genetic baseline are used. Incomplete baselines may result in wrong assignments at any hierarchical level, irrespective of sampling intensity for sampled candidate origins. We provide an extensive and publicly available baseline for <i>P. pinaster</i>, offering a useful tool for the management of forest genetic resources of this economically and ecologically important tree species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolutionary Applications
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic Assignment at Different Geographical Levels: A Case Study in a Forest Tree Species ( Pinus pinaster Ait.) Using SNP Markers

Juan José Robledo‐Arnuncio, Ricardo Alı́a, Santiago C. González‐Martínez, Marjana Westergren et al.
1 citations
Evolutionary Applications
Genetic diversity and population structure
1.82
article

Genetic Assignment at Different Geographical Levels: A Case Study in a Forest Tree Species ( Pinus pinaster Ait.) Using SNP Markers

Juan José Robledo‐Arnuncio, Ricardo Alı́a, Santiago C. González‐Martínez, Marjana Westergren, Sanna Olsson, Delphine Grivet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Genetic markers can assist in the identification of the stock origin in different organisms. Comparative studies of forest tree provenances have demonstrated that forest tree populations differ in performance across environments and at multiple geographic levels: populations nested within regions nested within gene pools. These levels are critical for conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources: regions of provenance are key units for seed marketing, while populations guide reproductive material collection under most seed regulations. Despite their potential, genetic methods have rarely been applied to identify forest tree origins due to methodological (sufficient number of highly discriminatory markers) and practical (construction of a baseline composed of a representative selection of samples) challenges. In our study, we analyzed a genomic dataset comprising 10,185 SNPs from 1579 samples of <i>Pinus pinaster</i>, a species with strong population structure, across 86 populations, 45 regions of provenance, and 10 gene pools, to discriminate among these hierarchical levels and assign individuals to them. We used two software packages to evaluate the reliability of our baseline dataset (i.e., reference data) for genetic discrimination and assignment: <i>RUBIAS</i>, which performs genetic stock identification and associated tasks, and <i>assignPOP</i>, implementing a supervised machine-learning genetic-assignment framework. Using numerical validation analyses, we assessed their suitability and limitations for origin inference at each geographical level. Our results indicate that origin assignment is reliable in <i>P. pinaster</i> at the gene pool and region of provenance levels, but less so at the population level, provided that the 10 K SNP markers and a comprehensive genetic baseline are used. Incomplete baselines may result in wrong assignments at any hierarchical level, irrespective of sampling intensity for sampled candidate origins. We provide an extensive and publicly available baseline for <i>P. pinaster</i>, offering a useful tool for the management of forest genetic resources of this economically and ecologically important tree species.

Evolutionary ApplicationsVol. 18(12)
CEA CESTA (FR), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Slovenian Forestry Institute (SI), UMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities (FR)
European Commission, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic diversity and population structure
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.