The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer

The May 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage determination allowed reimbursement for blood-based biomarker tests and other tests for colorectal cancer screening that meet minimum 74% sensitivity and 90% specificity thresholds. However, these performance benchmarks fail to account for the importance of detecting precancerous lesions and the impact of the recommended testing interval on the effectiveness of screening. We review the limitations of the CMS criteria, summarize supporting evidence for stool-based testing and colonoscopy as effective and cost-efficient screening modalities, and offer recommendations to strengthen CMS coverage decisions to better align with public health goals in colorectal cancer prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf341
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer

Richard M. Hoffman, Josheili Y. Llavona-Ortiz, Carolyn M. Rutter, Gloria D. Coronado
3 citations
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
3.14
article

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer

Richard M. Hoffman, Josheili Y. Llavona-Ortiz, Carolyn M. Rutter, Gloria D. Coronado
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The May 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage determination allowed reimbursement for blood-based biomarker tests and other tests for colorectal cancer screening that meet minimum 74% sensitivity and 90% specificity thresholds. However, these performance benchmarks fail to account for the importance of detecting precancerous lesions and the impact of the recommended testing interval on the effectiveness of screening. We review the limitations of the CMS criteria, summarize supporting evidence for stool-based testing and colonoscopy as effective and cost-efficient screening modalities, and offer recommendations to strengthen CMS coverage decisions to better align with public health goals in colorectal cancer prevention.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteVol. 118(3)
University of Iowa (US), Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), University of Arizona (US), Arizona Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.