Developing inclusive, antiracist approaches to public health research: Guidelines for action

The pervasive influence of racism confers on all public health researchers-even those for whom health disparities research is not their focus-a social responsibility to conduct research that is antiracist (i.e. to adopt research approaches that actively oppose racism and promote equity). This manuscript reviews the relevant literature and provides guidance for conducting antiracist public health research specifically for researchers for whom health disparities research is not a focus of their work. Drawing on Critical Race Theory, we propose a preliminary framework for conducting antiracist research in the form of five overarching guidelines, which were developed in the United States based on the American experience, but can be tailored/adapted to country-specific/cultural contexts: I. Frame race as a social (not a biological) construct; II. Actively solicit input and participation from individuals who are racial and ethnic minorities; III. Choose terminology carefully and be mindful of its implications; IV. Incorporate measures of contextual factors that may influence health-related behaviors and outcomes; and V. Be intentional with choices of theoretical frameworks, study design, and analytic approaches. We summarize relevant literature and provide recommendations and key references for how to follow each guideline. We also discuss how research that does not attend to these guidelines unintentionally supports racist structures and provide examples of how each guideline applies to research on the 2019 Coronavirus pandemic. Following the guidelines in this manuscript, though not exhaustive, will allow researchers to contribute to an antiracist public health agenda in pursuit of health equity regardless of content focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of public health research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251390936
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing inclusive, antiracist approaches to public health research: Guidelines for action

Akilah Dulin, David G. Zelaya, Diana S. Grigsby‐Toussaint, Chanelle J. Howe et al.
Journal of public health research
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Developing inclusive, antiracist approaches to public health research: Guidelines for action

Akilah Dulin, David G. Zelaya, Diana S. Grigsby‐Toussaint, Chanelle J. Howe, Christopher W. Kahler, Tayla von Ash
article en

Abstract

The pervasive influence of racism confers on all public health researchers-even those for whom health disparities research is not their focus-a social responsibility to conduct research that is antiracist (i.e. to adopt research approaches that actively oppose racism and promote equity). This manuscript reviews the relevant literature and provides guidance for conducting antiracist public health research specifically for researchers for whom health disparities research is not a focus of their work. Drawing on Critical Race Theory, we propose a preliminary framework for conducting antiracist research in the form of five overarching guidelines, which were developed in the United States based on the American experience, but can be tailored/adapted to country-specific/cultural contexts: I. Frame race as a social (not a biological) construct; II. Actively solicit input and participation from individuals who are racial and ethnic minorities; III. Choose terminology carefully and be mindful of its implications; IV. Incorporate measures of contextual factors that may influence health-related behaviors and outcomes; and V. Be intentional with choices of theoretical frameworks, study design, and analytic approaches. We summarize relevant literature and provide recommendations and key references for how to follow each guideline. We also discuss how research that does not attend to these guidelines unintentionally supports racist structures and provide examples of how each guideline applies to research on the 2019 Coronavirus pandemic. Following the guidelines in this manuscript, though not exhaustive, will allow researchers to contribute to an antiracist public health agenda in pursuit of health equity regardless of content focus.

Journal of public health researchVol. 14(4)
Boston University (US), Tulane University (US), Brown University (US), Bose (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.