Deep Learning in Scaphoid Fracture Detection and Healing Prediction: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hand Surgery

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone injuries and continue to pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their tendency for delayed union or non-union. Interpretation variability and delayed detection remain key contributors to missed injuries and adverse outcomes. Deep learning (DL) models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown strong performance in musculoskeletal imaging and offer potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostication in hand surgery. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and PMC was conducted covering January 2015 to March 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Studies were eligible if they applied DL algorithms to detect or classify scaphoid fractures or to predict union and non-union, and reported at least one diagnostic metric (accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, or specificity). Traditional machine-learning approaches, cadaveric studies, and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Fourteen peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Twelve evaluated DL for fracture detection, and two assessed fracture-healing prediction. Across detection studies, CNN-based models reported accuracies of 81-96% and AUCs up to 0.97. Transfer-learning architectures (DenseNet, ResNet, EfficientNet) consistently outperformed custom CNNs, particularly in multicentre datasets. Multi-view fusion of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs improved recall by approximately 12 percentage points compared with single-view analysis. Segmentation-enhanced models showed notable gains in occult fracture detection, identifying up to 41% of occult injuries compared with 6.8-13.7% by clinical experts. AI-augmented decision support improved novice radiologist performance, increasing AUC by 9-14 percentage points. For healing prediction, a custom CNN achieved 93.6% accuracy for post-surgical union, while a YOLOv5-ResNet-50 system classified union, non-union, or osteonecrosis with 91% accuracy (AUC 0.96). DL models demonstrate radiologist-level performance for scaphoid fracture detection and show encouraging potential for predicting union. Approaches incorporating segmentation, transfer learning, and multi-view inputs appear particularly promising for clinical workflows. Although early results support integration of AI-assisted tools into diagnostic pathways, robust multicentre validation and explainability frameworks remain essential before routine clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97900
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning in Scaphoid Fracture Detection and Healing Prediction: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hand Surgery

Arvind Karunakaran, Gaurav Jha, Surya Malasani, Roopkaran Dhanjal
Cureus
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Deep Learning in Scaphoid Fracture Detection and Healing Prediction: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hand Surgery

Arvind Karunakaran, Gaurav Jha, Surya Malasani, Roopkaran Dhanjal
article en

Abstract

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone injuries and continue to pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their tendency for delayed union or non-union. Interpretation variability and delayed detection remain key contributors to missed injuries and adverse outcomes. Deep learning (DL) models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown strong performance in musculoskeletal imaging and offer potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostication in hand surgery. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and PMC was conducted covering January 2015 to March 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Studies were eligible if they applied DL algorithms to detect or classify scaphoid fractures or to predict union and non-union, and reported at least one diagnostic metric (accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, or specificity). Traditional machine-learning approaches, cadaveric studies, and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Fourteen peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Twelve evaluated DL for fracture detection, and two assessed fracture-healing prediction. Across detection studies, CNN-based models reported accuracies of 81-96% and AUCs up to 0.97. Transfer-learning architectures (DenseNet, ResNet, EfficientNet) consistently outperformed custom CNNs, particularly in multicentre datasets. Multi-view fusion of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs improved recall by approximately 12 percentage points compared with single-view analysis. Segmentation-enhanced models showed notable gains in occult fracture detection, identifying up to 41% of occult injuries compared with 6.8-13.7% by clinical experts. AI-augmented decision support improved novice radiologist performance, increasing AUC by 9-14 percentage points. For healing prediction, a custom CNN achieved 93.6% accuracy for post-surgical union, while a YOLOv5-ResNet-50 system classified union, non-union, or osteonecrosis with 91% accuracy (AUC 0.96). DL models demonstrate radiologist-level performance for scaphoid fracture detection and show encouraging potential for predicting union. Approaches incorporating segmentation, transfer learning, and multi-view inputs appear particularly promising for clinical workflows. Although early results support integration of AI-assisted tools into diagnostic pathways, robust multicentre validation and explainability frameworks remain essential before routine clinical implementation.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.