Water Resources Planning Under Deep Uncertainty and Multiple Criteria–An Example in the Senegal River Basin

Abstract Water resources planning must take into account a range of interconnected and uncertain factors, including climate, technology, economic conditions, environmental concerns, and political systems. Conventional approaches to water resources planning often fall short when dealing with deep uncertainty—particularly uncertainties driven by climate change. This study introduces a novel framework for planning new water infrastructure using Engineering Options Analysis (EOA) to identify the most promising and adaptive development pathways. The framework differentiates between deep and statistical uncertainties and evaluates alternatives across thousands of potential future scenarios using Net Present Value (NPV) analysis and the Monte Carlo Temporal Analytic Hierarchy Process (MC‐TAHP). To enhance decision‐making, the framework incorporates two key managerial options—delay and cancellation—enabling the identification of pathways that are both robust and flexible. The approach is applied to the Senegal River Basin, where it successfully identifies three flexible development pathways. The findings show that integrating flexibility into planning can substantially improve system robustness by hedging against the risks of undesirable outcomes while maintaining opportunities for high performance. For instance, adding flexibility to KBG development pathway (the sequential construction of the Koukoutamba, Boureya, and Gourbassi dams) simultaneously reduces downside risk by raising the 10th percentile aggregated performance score from 0.19 to 0.35, and enhances upside potential by increasing the 90th percentile score from 0.89 to 0.96.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr041058
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Resources Planning Under Deep Uncertainty and Multiple Criteria–An Example in the Senegal River Basin

Laurent Bruckmann, Amaury Tilmant, Guilherme Fernandes Marques, Hamidreza Rezazadehkhorasani
Water Resources Research
Water resources management and optimization
article

Water Resources Planning Under Deep Uncertainty and Multiple Criteria–An Example in the Senegal River Basin

Laurent Bruckmann, Amaury Tilmant, Guilherme Fernandes Marques, Hamidreza Rezazadehkhorasani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Water resources planning must take into account a range of interconnected and uncertain factors, including climate, technology, economic conditions, environmental concerns, and political systems. Conventional approaches to water resources planning often fall short when dealing with deep uncertainty—particularly uncertainties driven by climate change. This study introduces a novel framework for planning new water infrastructure using Engineering Options Analysis (EOA) to identify the most promising and adaptive development pathways. The framework differentiates between deep and statistical uncertainties and evaluates alternatives across thousands of potential future scenarios using Net Present Value (NPV) analysis and the Monte Carlo Temporal Analytic Hierarchy Process (MC‐TAHP). To enhance decision‐making, the framework incorporates two key managerial options—delay and cancellation—enabling the identification of pathways that are both robust and flexible. The approach is applied to the Senegal River Basin, where it successfully identifies three flexible development pathways. The findings show that integrating flexibility into planning can substantially improve system robustness by hedging against the risks of undesirable outcomes while maintaining opportunities for high performance. For instance, adding flexibility to KBG development pathway (the sequential construction of the Koukoutamba, Boureya, and Gourbassi dams) simultaneously reduces downside risk by raising the 10th percentile aggregated performance score from 0.19 to 0.35, and enhances upside potential by increasing the 90th percentile score from 0.89 to 0.96.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(12)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Water Resources Planning Under Deep Uncertainty and Multiple Criteria–An Example in the Senegal River Basin — Laurent Bruckmann, Amaury Tilmant, et al. · Water Resources Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS