Less a Method than a Form: Repairing Shame and Illness in Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Kate Zambreno

In this essay, I explore how Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's A Dialogue on Love and Kate Zambreno's To Write as If Already Dead contest the relationship between illness and shame through their renegotiation of the confessional form. Both memoirs, in their incorporation of other authorial positions ranging from case notes to novels, address an interlocutor, whose presence halts the circulation of shame. Consequently, I argue that Sedgwick and Zambreno enact a kind of reparative reading within their memoirs' form, and I trace how the relationality of their works moves towards repairing the harms of medicalized shame. Counter to current debates around post-critique and the method wars, I discuss how Sedgwick and Zambreno's memoirs model their own reading practice within their pages, a practice that is inextricable from their understanding of shame and illness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Literature and medicine
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2025.a975549
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Less a Method than a Form: Repairing Shame and Illness in Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Kate Zambreno

Chloe R. Green
Literature and medicine
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Less a Method than a Form: Repairing Shame and Illness in Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Kate Zambreno

Chloe R. Green
article en

Abstract

In this essay, I explore how Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's A Dialogue on Love and Kate Zambreno's To Write as If Already Dead contest the relationship between illness and shame through their renegotiation of the confessional form. Both memoirs, in their incorporation of other authorial positions ranging from case notes to novels, address an interlocutor, whose presence halts the circulation of shame. Consequently, I argue that Sedgwick and Zambreno enact a kind of reparative reading within their memoirs' form, and I trace how the relationality of their works moves towards repairing the harms of medicalized shame. Counter to current debates around post-critique and the method wars, I discuss how Sedgwick and Zambreno's memoirs model their own reading practice within their pages, a practice that is inextricable from their understanding of shame and illness.

Literature and medicineVol. 43(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.